Search results

If such an argument can be made then do so. Make the argument, Omniskeptical! Fair warning: You might need to take the day off from work because it will require more than a single sentence response!

I am simply responding to what I am reading. If I am missing something then that's why I'm asking you to tell me what your point is. Okay fine but I'm pretty sure I know how to read and I quoted your exact words and specifically asked you to explain how two, seemingly incongruous ideas can fit...

It has nothing to do with my imagination. I'm reading the thread and trying to wrap my head around what you could possibly be trying to insinuate. Then everything you've said in this entire thread is a lie? Is that what you want me to believe? If God's book is "just fine" then please explain...

So just what is your point here, Tambora? Are you trying to undermine the word of God or are you just doing that by accident? Just what is it that you think is supposed to be included in God's book that He failed to include?

I do not care what makes you laugh! I totally could NOT care less what makes you laugh! DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING OF ANY SUBSTANCE TO CONTRIBUTE? Do you have even the slightest ability to make any sort of rational argument? NO! Of course you don't. You're a laughing idiot.

"Prove" it, no it doesn't "prove" it but it certainly does make a sound argument. All you'd have to do to refute it is show me one single counter example. Of all the people in the world who have an interest in knowing about and deceminating examples of Jewish literature describing God it terms...

All knowing mankind? Who said anything about that? And the idea of omniscience has NO historical record prior to the writings of Plato. It does not exist in Jewish literature at all. If it did, every Calvinist in the world would have it memorized. Instead, they never bring it up and do things...

No, apparently I don't! What's so stupid about it? If.... Aristotle was a pagan Greek philosopher, which he was, and... "Omniscience" is an Aristotelian concept, which it is, and... "Omniscience" means to know absolutely every detail of existence, which is what it definitely meant to Aristotle...

All the other details in this discussion are just so much noise. This is the critical point upon which evolution fails. There is simply no way, no matter how long a period of time is allotted, for a random process to create anything but meaningless noise. There simply is no such thing as random...

Excellent!

Because no one is stupid enough to take that idiotic claim seriously. (Besides that, I refuted it weeks ago with no substantive response from Ktoyou or anyone else.)

See Right Divider's post above. I can't respond with anything better. The real problem here is three fold. 1. You accept all kinds of things as veritable proof of evolution, that aren't even close to even being evidence, never mind proof (see above posts for examples). 2. You entirely ignore...

If you actually believe that socialism works then thinking for you is basically a waste of your time. You only have a couple of centuries (at least) of proof that it fails to work every single time its tried. The fact is, however, that you don't actually care if it works or not. You don't care...

This is the only thing you said worth responding to. I made no ad hominems. Stating facts based on clear evidence is not an ad hominem attack. Ad hominems happen when people try to argue that their opponent's position is false based on the fact the their opponent is stupid (or whatever name...

One tiny part of why evolution isn't science. In its present form, it isn't even falsifiable, never mind scientific. Adaptation is not evolution. There are experiments that have been running for literally decades with thousands upon thousands of generations of bacteria and not only are they...

God is not the know it all that Calvinists make Him out to be. He is not only able and willing but actually does give men privacy. He is not required to even be a first person witness to every vile act of evil men perform, much less having to have known it in advance of time itself! He is also...

They are liars. The evidence is undeniable. Literally UNDENIABLE. So much so that, at this point, you are either lying yourself or you are stupid. You are a liar. I've seen the entire unedited video. They emptied the room and when they thought the coast was clear they pulled out boxes full of...

No! There has never been a single scintilla of anything that is evolution that has ever been observed - PERIOD! I don't care how many YouTube videos claim otherwise. I don't care how many different strains of Sal-manila bacterium you can get to replicate, I don't care how many "variants" of a...

It is an interesting tactic for those who cannot defend their doctrine to take. Simply pretend like no one ever makes any argument at all! Just pretend like those who present evidence against your doctrine do not exist and that the evidence they've presented does not exist. Just move on past it...

No, Skeeter, it absolutely cannot account for any such thing. Evolutionists can fantasize about how it might have happened but there is exactly zero evidence that such fantasies actually did happen nor is there any mindless, undirected mechanism in nature that could possibly cause it!