Search results

You're not making any sense.

Yes! Definitely! I see that you can't tell when you've contradicted your own position!

It is genuinely baffling to me how people can be so willfully blind. Justice is not a difficult concept! Deuteronomy 32:4 He is the Rock, His work is perfect; For all His ways are justice, A God of truth and without injustice; Righteous and upright is He. They are so blind in fact that even...

He won't answer you. If he did, he'd tell you that part of God's immutability is God's impassibility. He is not happy now, angry later, sad next week and then happy again in the spring. All such talk of God being angry or saddened or pleased is all just a figure of speech. It's all...

It's far far worse than that, marke! It is NOT that God doesn't allow sinners to get saved. The concept of someone allowing something to happen or not presupposes that its possible for it to happen in the first place. God doesn't merely allow sin, He ordains it. He doesn't merely disallow some...

Notice how every argument to the contrary is ignored by the Calvinist? They don't care about truth because they don't worship the God of truth. They worship a figment of Aristotle's imagination.

That might be the stupidest thing I've read in the last six months! Just because we cannot create or destroy energy doesn't mean that the SUPER-NATURAL God can't do so! God isn't bound by the laws of physics! DUH!

That question only makes sense to ask from within your own twisted paradigm. Any answer to that question would only ever serve as some sort of queer point in the mind of someone who has redefined practically every word in the English language to suit their false teaching. Does the drowning man...

I'll stop short of calling this a lie in the intentional sense of the word because this fool actually does believe this nonsense, but it is very definitely a false teaching. The fact that man has a free will is not only evident in every single moment of our lives but it is a concept found...

You read your doctrine into every passage you read and think you've presented a proof text! You are quite literally blinded by your own rhetoric. You won't even rationally discuss anything because you can't. You redefined every theological word of any importance to the point that you aren't even...

You read your doctrine into every passage you read and think you've presented a proof text! You are quite literally blinded by your own rhetoric. You won't even rationally discuss anything because you can't. You redefined every theological word of any importance to the point that you aren't even...

Unfalsifiable nonsense! When you're allowed to redefine words and to make up new terms that have whatever meaning you need them to have to fit your doctrine then the doctrine becomes unfalsifiable and therefore meaningless. For the Calvinist, it is even worse than that because the do not stop...

No it most certainly is not Paul's! That is advice! Terrific advice to be sure but Paul (i.e. God through Paul) is not giving us a new law! The previous verse says, "The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. And likewise the husband does not have authority over...

Translation: "No, I can't point to any post anywhere, on any thread at any time, where any such claim was made. How dumb of you to ask! Did you think I had actually read any of this thread?"

What I am reacting to is your contention that a spouse has no right to refuse sex which is completely asinine and leads to a situation where rape is not possible within a marriage.

Poppy cock! There is no such teaching in scripture. The verse you cite is general advice and it's good advice but it cannot be rightly used to construe such a law. There are as many different reasons for a wife to withdraw sexually as there are women who have done it. Some of those reasons are...

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. I certainly hope that I am because it seems to me that he believes that God has created a situation where rape cannot occur within a marriage and that if anything similar to rape happens it's the fault of whichever spouse was the one saying "No!" because...

Prediction confirmed. There was never any chance whatsoever that any straight answer was forthcoming from B57 to a perfectly clear and simply question that any Calvinists couldn't possibly resist the need to complicate. The fact is that it doesn't depend on what I mean by call! Your own...

What you see or don't see is not relevant. The FACT is that there is nothing there that "expressly forbids" anything! Thank you for conceding the debate. Forbidding a spouse to withdraw consent would be a de-facto permission to rape, by definition. No it IS NOT!!! Good grief man! Listen to...

False premise. I Corinthians does not expressly forbid any such thing. The bible does not teach a defacto permission to rape one's wife! It is NOT the fault of the wife if the husband forces himself on her! This is perhaps the most foolishly evil position I've ever seen you take.