Search results

"I do not believe that just because you're opposed to abortion that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don't...

No. Your side is the one trying to tell people what they can't do in this case. That will have consequences both intended and unintended, both positive and negative. This is your issue and your policy, so you are the ones who must own up to the consequences, whether you like them or not.

Surely you are eager to accept responsibility for the consequences of the policies you support, are you not?

No.

How is this committee going to prevent Trump from running again? Keep loving it then. There's more to come!

Well, you guys were able to get Roe v Wade overturned, so I'm sure you're more than willing to power through a few inconvenient hurdles to adopt. Surely all those pro-life Republican congressmen can pass legislation to streamline the process and make it easier for you.

Fascinating. Well, we'll all find out the truth soon enough, won't we?

What's odd is that I don't see any twisting going on at all. I can't seem to find that story in any news outlet other than Gateway Pundit, aka "WingNutDotCom".

What exactly do you mean by "fantastic"? When will the 2020 election be overturned? When will Trump be reinstated to the presidency? Or does all of this really amount to nothing?

Hey, she earned it! Obviously, she expected him to drop dead at any minute and inherit his full fortune, but since Dominion has an iron-clad case of defamation against Fox News, et al., she knows she needs to just cut her losses and take what she can get right now.

That's right, your work has just started. And your work starts with getting your adoption game going in full swing. Oh, and a lot of those adoptees are going to be black and brown. You won't mind that, will you? I didn't think so...

How's that working out for you?

A 2021 PNAS study by political scientists at Stanford University and the University of Chicago rebutted Lott's paper as being not even remotely convincing, writing that his analysis was "entirely dependent on the completely arbitrary order in which pairs of precincts in other counties are...

Oh there was voter fraud all right: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/the-villages-voter-fraud-1337352/

A 2021 PNAS study by political scientists at Stanford University and the University of Chicago rebutted Lott's paper as being not even remotely convincing, writing that his analysis was "entirely dependent on the completely arbitrary order in which pairs of precincts in other counties are...

RINOs! RINOs everywhere!

Lol...

What? That would mean no more TOL! What will you do with your time all day and half the night from then on? You'll be bored stiff!

RIP to your sanity.