Search results

You boast of arrogance! Wow! That's a first! Do you also believe that you love God more Paul did? Philippians 3:7 But what things were gain to me, these I have counted loss for Christ. 8 Yet indeed I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for...

The arrogance of this is breath taking! Hoping loves God more than all the Christians in the world who still do something wrong from time to time. Not only that but he not afraid to tell you so! How is it even possible for people to be so self-deluded that they cannot hear their own words...

Rebel's reaction to my post simply baffles me and so I went back and reread this trying to figure out whether I had missed something. It reads the same to me today as it did the first time I read it. I see no way to interpret it other than that Rebel thinks that a marriage between biblical...

What is it around here that makes people think I'm being hostile! There was no hostility! There were no insults or anything else of the sort! I didn't post anything in all caps or even use an exclamation point for crying out loud! That was the clear implication. Otherwise, where's the need to...

Anyone who thinks such a thing isn't a Christian and might as well throw their bible into the river and feed some microbes with it. It doesn't work, Rebel. If you're actually interested in truth, you need to forget about trying to believe in the Big Bang and Evolution, both of which are so full...

Yeah, sure, whatever. If you can refute a syllable of what I've said I'd receive it gladly but you won't because you can't. You couldn't respond with substance if your life depended on it. If you could, wild horses couldn't prevent you from doing it. All you've got is insult and bald claims of...

He's a bigger idiot than even you are! He thinks he doesn't ever do anything wrong.

You are a liar. What in the world could you possibly consider the word "proof" to mean? Stating your doctrine isn't even an argument! Even if you put "Premise 1:" in front of it! And the answer to your question 1 is, "YES!" Perfectly, totally, absolutely without blemish, in Him! You...

Prove it. You won't because you're the liar here, not me. THIS WEBSITE IS 100% A WASTE OF TIME!

I understand that whatever the teaching is, it does not exist in the bible. Jesus forgot to teach it and He failed to remind any of His apostles to teach it. What Jesus did teach is "It is finished." The unwritten premise being, "Arguing against something that you do not COMPLETELY understand...

I said just the opposite of "mutual false assumptions"! The whole premise is reasonable assumptions for all methods and various methods that have diverse (i.e. different) assumptions. However, separate methods wouldn't be required to have different assumptions so long as the assumptions are...

Why would written history be the only standard by which a dating method could be verified? I understand that written history could be used as evidence in an attempt to verify some dating method but written history is hardly objective and so I don't see how it could be used as any sort of gold...

I have no idea what you could be talking about. You seem not to have the time for posting more than a sentence or two at time so an interesting conversation isn't possible anyway. BORED!

Excellent! What would you say that Paul preached about who Jesus is? Obviously, he would have preached that Jesus was the Son of God but do you suppose that Paul would have gone further than that and made a big deal about Jesus being God Himself in the flesh? Also, I need some clarification...

I was sort of hoping you'd spell it out for me. Just what is it that Paul preached? To be clear...I'm not disagreeing with you here at all. I'm just interested to see how you'd go about putting the gospel into words, that's all.

Which is?

The Earth. A conditional blessing taught by Jesus to Israel in keeping with their dispensation of law. Believing Israel will live on the new Earth and New Jerusalem will be their capital city. We, who are saved under the current dispensation of grace, have no such conditional blessings and our...

Where did @Old Hat go? He started the most interesting doctrinal conversation I've seen in weeks and then disappeared! :(

That's the way it's always been explained to me anyway. It has consistently made me wonder how do they know that it was ever entangled in the first place.