Search results

Why can't you answer the questions I asked? Tainted how? Flawed how? Address the points made in post #26 please. Do the flaws you think are so important make a significant difference to the overarching plot of the Bible? Try starting with a few examples of so-called "facts." That's what the...

Tainted how? Flawed how? Does it make a difference to the overarching plot of the Bible? If so, how? Because you say so? Saying it doesn't make it so.

Exactly the "specific circumstances" (from my post in the other thread) I was thinking of, haha! Agreed! Indeed.

It's a way of speaking that isn't used anymore, except in specific circumstances. "Y'all" is just "you all," and is slang. "Ye" "thee" "thou" "thy" etc., were an attempt to maintain the distinction between singular and plural second person pronouns and verb forms from the Hebrew, Aramaic, and...

If all you have is a personal belief and a lack of understanding, then why should we listen to you? It may have been at some point in the past, but it is definitely not the best translation we have today. Why do you assume God needs to keep the Bible "infallible" (without error) in order to...

Completely outdated, yes. But obsolete it is not. It still serves as an important anchor and teaching tool in and for Christian history, and even history in general. The archaic English is (mostly) not helpful to modern English speakers, though the usage of "thee" "thou" "thy" and "ye"...

No, it wouldn't be higher. You keep forgetting that the death penalty, properly enforced, is a deterrent against crime. All it would take is one or two swiftly and painfully enforced executions and the crime rate would plummet to almost zero overnight. Why? Because criminals would, generally...

Far fewer than under the current system. Not only is it acknowledged, it's expected. So why do you need more points of accountability when one will suffice? Why do you assume that this will be the norm? All the more reason to make the best effort of uncovering the truth, using the...

She's also 64 years old.

Don't forget loving and good!

You say this as if one "authoritative" witness can establish a matter... The Bible says it cannot. I have logic, reason, and the internal consistency of the Bible that tells me that the KJV, let alone all the other Bibles in the world, contains errors. All you have is your opinion that it...

Comments have been moved from the other thread.

Again, naar is used. Therefore it CANNOT mean "little children." Thus, it likely is presenting the youn men in a negative light. And why shouldn't it? They are insulting a prophet of God, and even God Himself. I would think that it's similar to how Jesus used the diminutive form of dog when...

Which means that the KJV is WRONG when it calls the "young men" "little children." "Very young men" is still not "little children," no matter how much you try to rationalize it. So what? No one cares. It does. The thread at the following link includes photos of the original handwritten...

As I've said before: Allowing a convicted criminal to appeal his case undermines the authority given to the judge, and adds unnecessary delay to resolving a case. Then what's the problem? Mistakes are inevitable regardless of the system, Arthur, including yours, so this isn't an argument at...

Stubbornly believing falsehoods is a bad idea. You should humble yourself and ask God to help you with it. That's because you have an a priori commitment to the belief that the KJV is superior in some way. And we're not just "claiming [your] KJV Bible is poorly translated," marke. We're...

Then why didn't you just answer honestly and say, "I know of three or four various 'solutions.' They are...." and then list the solutions you know of? Usually when someone asks a question, they expect an answer. Clearly not paying attention.

In other words, no, you don't know how to resolve it. Here's how I know: because your theology does not rightly divide God's word.

Good. Maybe most of them will be the perverts. One can hope, at least.

The problem is that they're not trying to ELIMINATE the debt, but rather "maintain the status quo." When it comes to debt, you're either sinking along with the ship, (treading water inside a sinking ship is still sinking), or you're swimming to safety (ie, reducing it). You HAVE to be proactive...