Search results

And you think B57 disagrees with that?

B57 is unlikely to engage you. He isn't here to debate his doctrine. He is simply interested in stating it and pretending that he's established it by virtue of the fact that he showed up here to say it. Personally, I have to confess that I don't get it. What is it that you think B57 is stating...

There is more than one kind of prophecy. There is predictive prophecy where someone says something like "490 years from this event, the Messiah will come." The book of Daniel is full of this sort of prophesy. This, however, is not the predominate kind of prophecy in the bible. The other sort of...

That is so totally false its just astonishing. It sort of disturbs me, the degree to which you seem to know almost nothing about who God is, what sort of person He is. If Israel, as a nation, as a people, in mass, had come to Jesus in humility and faith and acknowledged Him as their promised...

All joking aside... How is it even possible that people have such a low view of God that they are willing to present such silly things as miracles performed by the God who died and rose from the dead on their behalf? It seems to me that a belief that Zeus throws lightening bolts would be a...

So, one moment your toe was infected, the next it wasn't. Is that what you're claiming happened? Is the cause of the condition (i.e. the diabetes) still present, or is just the toe that God performed a miracle on? Can you provide any evidence that the mother board was shorted out? I trying to...

Says the lying fool.

The exact number is ZERO. If you claim otherwise, then define the word "miracle". Clete P.S. Don't read hostility into what is said above. It's just me starting a debate on the subject of miracles. Christians throw around the term "miracle" all the time and it ends up painting God in a very...

Past tense! There is no way that you'll ever convince me that you aren't mixing tenses on purpose. Your goal is confuse and obfuscate not to understand or discuss.

No, that describes the bible, not the book that Bob wrote about the bible. No. Nonsense. The only authoritative anything that ANY Christian has is the bible itself. Just as your Pope's have not been infallible, Bob was not infallible. A major differences being that Bob never claimed to be...

It says that they are are NOT saved apart from gentiles as another church with another gospel. AND YOU KNOW IT! Who are you trying to convince here with this? It makes no sense! There is no longer any Jew or Gentile except as a matter of genetics or nationality. When it comes to getting saved...

Lie. Intentional lie! Tambora KNOWS for a fact that this idiotic claim is flatly false. Those of you engaging her need to ask yourselves what her motives are. LIE! Stupidity! This claim cannot possibly make sense even to Tambora! LOL! Another Gog/Magog invasion?! What can that possibly...

Nice! I did not know that verse existed. I will be remembering that one. Iron sharpening iron.

Call it what you like, as if it makes any difference. Discussion, like debate, requires that both parties respond with substance to what the other has said rather than routinely ignoring any response and simply repeating your position as though nothing was said to counter it.d You're a liar...

Nope. It is Luke's BOOK - not sentence. As I've said repeatedly, there isn't any need to guess. The text of Acts itself tells you what's happening.

b57 isn't here to debate things or to even have conversations, he's here to state his doctrine, not to defend it, to state it. He will, therefore, almost certainly not respond to this post, or any other post for that matter. I, on the other hand, desire to crush the Calvinist Cult into powder...

I never suggested that it did! The problem is that you're on a debate forum. NO ONE but you gives a damn about what you can show up here and claim to be true. Any idiot can do that. It's boring. No, it isn't, Tambora. Not in dispute - therefore - not relevant to the point. We can talk about...

Great argument! It wasn't a slur. Ignorance is common, even expected. It's stupidity that can't be fixed. Saying it doesn't make it so, Tambora. As stated this claim isn't even relevant. Were you attempting to imply some kind of argument here? In other words.... How do you know that this is...

Everything after the mid-Acts period has to be confusing for those who believe that the church age started with "You are Peter..." in Matthew 16. By the way, when pressed, nearly everyone who isn't Mid-Acts believes that the so called "church age" began during Christ's ministry, not Acts 2. The...

Okay. No argument there. My point was simply to say that AFTER the resurrection and AFTER Pentecost (a Jewish holiday), the nation officially rejected Christ as their Messiah after several undeniable miracles and Stephen's arguments from scripture and that, therefore, your rebuttal about them...