Search results

Yes, and? Yes, what is your point?

I always substitute "ACLU" with "Anti-Christ Legions of the Underworld." Makes it all the more funny.

... with a post that was off topic to what was being discussed among myself, Cabinet, and Clete. Yes, it is. There is nothing illogical about what I said. Then you shouldn't have posted anything in this thread. Yes. There's a difference between being insulting as Christ was insulting...

Because that's what we were talking about before you butted in with your OFF TOPIC statement about David. No. I want you to answer the questions I asked. Do you believe that we (that is, modern human governments; I'm not talking about the Body of Christ, but rather of governmental...

Aside from what I said earlier, and if I'm forgetting to reply to your last reponse to me, please let me know, I just wanted to post something that I was reminded of today before I forget it, the phrase God uttered to Adam when He warned him against eating of the tree could be more accurately...

How many times do I have to agree with this point before you stop making it? I'm not saying David was punished according to the law. I'm saying David was punished. Period. No one has said there was. Why is it so hard for you to acknowledge that David was punished for his adultery with...

And yet, the law remained against adultery, and David was punished directly by God for both his adultery with Bathsheba and his murder of Uriah. It's not either/or, Tambora. It's BOTH/AND. Tambora, to make things clear here, please answer the following question: Do you believe that we (that...

You must have missed it when I also said that God originally gave the land to Israel. Remember the Promised Land? Yeah, that's the land that Israel only PARTIALLY owns currently, the rest is currently in the possession of other nations.

Ok, and?

What a fool you are!

So does criminal justice. And I pointed out to you that the law that said to execute adulterers remained, despite God not killing David for his crime, and that David was still punished. Now, please address the questions you have been asked multiple times now: Tambora, to make things clear...

Still trying to conflate two different things. The New Covenant was for Israel for the end times. Not the Body of Christ today. We were talking about criminal justice LONG before you jumped in and made an OFF TOPIC post about God's response to sin.

Exactly my point. There's not a drop of water in the baptism of the Holy Spirit. IOW... The Holy Spirit is what we are being baptised into, not water.

It's referring to the ONE baptism of the Holy Spirit. As opposed to the MANY baptisms Israel had.

Liar. I have given you my endorsement of The Plot. What I have not done and refuse to do, is put it on the same level as scripture, or claim that it is somehow authoritative. That would be idolatry. If it's wrong, then demonstrate it. But you won't even read it, so how could you? You...

What's your point? The land belongs to God. We just live on it. The land where all those Balestinians live was given by God to the House of Israel to begin with. It belongs to them. P.S. Yes, the "B" in "Balestinians" was intentional.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Then why did you jump into the middle of a conversation ABOUT how modern governments should treat criminals today with a comment on how God did not punish David according to the law? Perhaps you can answer my question: Tambora, to make things clear here, please answer the following question...

I'm reminded of Paul in Acts 17: Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a synagogue of the Jews. Then Paul, as his custom was, went in to them, and for three Sabbaths reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and...