Search results

It's because they've been taught that "IT'S BARBARIC!" or "We've moved beyond that as a society." It's a form of idolatry, placing one's-self on the pedestal of arbiter of what is just and unjust, when God Himself has already declared just punishments for criminals. It's an attempt at being...

Then you've done something wrong. No, not reading the Bible. You've let something non-biblical slip into your reading of it. And after, too. Whatever that's supposed to mean... He said that to people who had broken the law by not bringing BOTH the adulterer AND the adulteress, as the law...

AMEN! You need a functional brain to understand spiritual things. If your brain isn't functioning properly, you have no hope of understanding anything spiritual. That's why Paul says "spiritually discerned."

Whoosh.

@Sherman

You're too nice! 🤮 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad...

Alright, time to start a new thread.

:think: At that time the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Who then is greatest in the kingdom of heaven?” Then Jesus called a little child to Him, set him in the midst of them, and said, “Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means...

Please state your point succinctly.

And you're only saying something about it now? What good does that do?

His ban has already expired.

No one has removed anything as far as I'm aware.

Good. Your post is still there for everyone to read. Is there a point your trying to make?

Scripture. Which is why it's so important to rightly divide the word.

"If you are a terrorist, you are a terrorist."

Use the "Paste as Plain Text" option in the right click menu when you right click in the text box.

Repeating your argument when I've already addressed it won't progress the conversation, Gary. Not with me, it won't. Using an argument that is consistent with MY position doesn't advance your position.

What I think has nothing to do with it. It is not a form of asking for forgiveness. Asking for forgiveness is asking for forgiveness. Apologizing is apologizing. One comes before the other, and if you ask forgiveness without apologizing, it's extremely disrespectful to the one you have...

See, you can apologize without asking for forgiveness. So why not listen to what Paul said, too? Why only Jesus? You don't get to pick and choose which parts of the Bible you get to adhere to and which parts you can just ignore. That's because you're too stubborn to admit when you're wrong.

You shouldn't swear. Let your yes be yes and your no be no. Yes, I did in fact say that. Problem? Correct. I never said that. Why would you think that? I presume by "OC" you mean "Old Covenant"... whatever that's supposed to mean... Both the New Covenant and the Old Covenant apply...