Search results

Do you have any mutations? Did they damage you? The rare mutation is damaging to an individual. Accumulating benign mutations that can coalesce to increase variability in populations and can test out reproductive success is a clear path to adaptation over time. You have yet to articulate...

Stop looking for who and start understanding how. You think you have access to absolute right and wrong through God. You strain to make sense of a sacred book and apply it to modern problems? If we agree to the simply criteria that it is a virtue to reduce human suffering and increase...

The change in allele frequencies across generations means a pathway to success is forged over time. Organisms are better and better able to contend with environmental changes.

I do not think you know what random means. Evolution is not a random process and neither is morality based on reason rather. Your foundation is illusory. A ball of contradictions can do you no good even though you have a sense of deluded certainty.

Meanwhile autocracy has no balancing mechanism leaving evil to grow unchecked. A Democratic Republic is the closest humans can come to government by reason because it exposes ego and superstition.

You brought up those terms. You can have them. They only obliquely apply to what I mentioned to right divider.

I am. God?

A deity.

Oh -- get out of town. How so? It beats a pretend scaffolding attached to an unproveable, unfathomable force.

No, its delicious.

Yes it can. Okay, I am in the sense that It is systematic and leads to storage of information over time. It is in no way a sentient or executive intelligence though. Only from a warped misunderstanding that the status quo should be maintained. It changes the genes. Leave your values aside.

Through a harm reduction model of contingency management and a rubric of mutual solidarity ie social contract with my fellow humans. How's your authoritarian prism from the iron age that cloaks and refracts your own biases working for you?

They are positive.

Even in the simplistic way you are looking at it, a mutation by repetition adds information. It literally adds a substrate for the environment to have "it's" say about. It could possibly be just noise for a while in the gene pool. However, it could alone or in combination with other mutations...

Foolishness. Dawkins has been entirely consistent in his stance. He allows that he does not know with absolute certainty that there wasn't intelligent input during evolution but he is 99.99% sure there wasn't. You reward his acknowledgment that he is not an absolute arbiter of truth by saying...

How about love and affection?

Is this joke funny?: Why wouldn't the Amish parent's take their daughter back after Rumspringa? She was too Mennonite.

Yes - some say they have sex with the same gender. Seems like groupthink to me. When discussing evolution? When discussing entertainment?

What? Were you a prison guard at Auschwitz in a past life or something? You mean like you did with gays? I have observed in the last weeks various such comments from your entourage; Posters going out of their way to add an anti-gay comment for no good reason, and finally reflected upon it...

Okay. Divider divided the forest into clusters and missed the interconnectedness of all species of animals. The multi-method multi-lab approach with double blind controls argues against confirmation bias.