Search results

Why? Does 'righteous' mean 'perfect' Joe? Are you perfect? Which? Show me a couple of examples of President Lincoln and the Civil War? "Only natural" that you'd say that (he and his group did write it, glad you are open to accepting that). There is a desire to be gladdened by that, but...

Outrageous? Look at the summation of your book: "...ONLY natural..." It is a book for natural men to feel good about themselves. It isn't a book of life and death between the holy and the mundane. In all actuality, it isn't a book that gives you any advice, just gives you 'ideas' that...

I read an interesting article about one college's finding regarding extremism recently (will have to look for it again). It said that the left and right are remarkably the same at the extreme ends. I'm not sure if the take-away was that media and politics made the division by spotlighting...

Some of this is given by theologians to try and address/explain something. I've no idea why Satan is left alive. What I do know, is that it doesn't seem to be the answer. The story of the wheat and tares talks about a desire that no wheat is harmed. You address a scenario where it'd seem...

So does the UB, they have built off of that narrative and TRIED to change it. Is that what you actually want? An 'edited' God? 🤔 When does it only become what is in your head, instead of what is written, Caino? Does that time EVER come? You 'think' you were smart (as did Sadler) but...

Moderate? Probably a good place with a nation being ripped in half by partisan groups on the extremes (the extremes of both the Right AND the Left are 'untethered' as it were). Politically, I'm still right-leaning on many issues. It is a pleasant enlightenment to read you are too...

Er, by people trying to 'wax poetic?' That makes no sense to me at all and is reaching. As I said, it has "Kelloggs" all over it. You missed the point: There are many many more Christians in nonEnglish speaking countries, yet, given our proclivity toward self-importance, we English...

You didn't ask any questions... Er, The UB has Kelloggs written all over it. Your doctor attended Wellville. Caino, It doesn't even 'seem' reasonable that God would speak to anybody in/from America for a 'new' message. We've only been in existence 200 years yet have the majority of cults...

They don't really understand that we half agree with them. They always argue over the half we already would agree with 'as if' we don't believe the Son isn't the Father.

It doesn't literally matter, what you believe. It matters what is demonstrable and this ain't it. You've a lot of weird culty ideas, no exception here. My HOPE was that I could get you to actually think instead of just rattle off brainwashed material...

You cannot read lines nor inbetween them! :doh: Wake up! It is just Kellogg's dumb, Caino! Literally. Read a few lines before: :doh: Kelloggs inanity all over it!! THIS Kellogg Not the point! WAKE UP, CAINO!!!

Well, I mispoke, I meant 'one saving gospel today.' Every MidActs I've talked to says there is but one saving gospel for all men today. That is why Paul said if any preached 'any other gospel, they are accursed' as far as I understand. . I said rather that today, there is only one...

Er, no. You completely miss that my addressing you here is care and concern that you are so easily rendered and duped. Instead what do you do? Dig in, posture, over what you know implicitly is wrong. You KNOW the UB isn't up to scratch, Caino! There is no way you don't (or is there?) 🤔...

It isn't that God's promises are void to Jews, that wasn't my point. My point is that you, a wild olive branch, have to be careful not to read the cultured, loved, olive trees' mail. You and I are grafted into something different and our promises are found largely in Paul's writings --the...

Nope. Nice try. Just as bad as you read the Bible. Well, there you go. Now at least I know why you can't stand the Bible and love an odd little book. You can't read. Yes, actually, the very very first. Why? Because you don't know what you are talking about. You fail as a mind reader...

Nope. No. That is 'policy' not to be confused with 'theology.' Do I disagree with Catholics? Yes, but I don't confuse the two. I realize that. I'm not charismatic either. Sensationalism isn't rational. David danced in his underwear, but it shouldn't become a doctrine that everyone...

You are yet confusing people with doctrine. We were talking about doctrine. It is all reading into it. Feeling-centered guesses.

Doesn't matter. You've rejected ANY discussion with men and women smarter than your mere 60k. In the end, it is literally that odd little Australian, wholly audacious number that is entirely of 'no substance whatsover.' Go ahead and keep posturing, Trevor. I personally see it as...

1) is it appropriate to characterize a question so? 2) his post was addressing 'if' it were a Bible quote? Wouldn't all you would have needed, was to post the quoted 'scripture' verbatim? 🤔 3) Try not to be so easily offended? I'd think a Catholic 'could' have asked the same question...

Trevor, Trevor, Trevor. Posturing without listening gets you nothing. You can go your happily, chosen, ignorant way. The rest of the millions and millions (hundreds of them) KNOW what you don't. You really think God came to an oddball little group and told only you something different...