Search results

  1. A

    Would Trump be America's 1st Illiterate President?

    Ah, 7, still angry all the time. Take your meds.
  2. A

    Would Trump be America's 1st Illiterate President?

    Oh, I'm sure Trump can read. He just doesn't like to. He likes things to be simple and easy to understand. Problem is that lots of things are not necessarily simple---the effect of tariffs on the prices of goods for example.
  3. A

    Trump Harris debate

    Ah, a rumor on the internet. Must be true. I keep hearing rumors that Melania is just waiting for him to lose, go to the pokey and divorce him.
  4. A

    Trump Harris debate

    It was certainly intended to suggest to Republican women and any women on the fence that a Trump administration will be "keep 'em barefoot and pregnant". It was not intended to sway Trump's base, that Kool-Aid has already been drunk. I think it was intended to sway those undecideds who were...
  5. A

    Kabul Fell Yesterday, Where Is The President

    The deal was made by donny, not Joe.
  6. A

    Is there any obvious evidence today for the biblical global Flood?

    has anyone every provided an answer to what happens to all the heat (h bomb equivalents) brown has suggested? where does that go?
  7. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    actually she is not very good at reading or typing. lacks a certain amount of brain power and manual dexterity. she can run really really fast though and can her ability to smell things is really really much better than mine. different evolutionary branches on that tree of life
  8. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    alate who you referenced seemed to have a pretty good handle on niology. but please provide evidence for your claim that darwinists have been on earth for 4.5 billion years. it pains me to say this to someone who has a command of english, but you are simply brutally ignorant. i would do better...
  9. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    well first question is to define “human”. all genus Homo or just H sapiens? but you know the answer—evolution. which you already accept in terms of “branching out” after creation and or the flood
  10. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    actually even taxonomy based on morphology can depend on appearances. some taxonomists are lumpers and some splitters
  11. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    Today genetics is also used
  12. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    no
  13. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    taxonomy is the classification of things according to their characteristics. i think we are speaking of the classification of living things according to their characteristics. i’m not sure what you mean by defining it as “affirming propositions”
  14. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    well i must apologize for this post. since i have asked specific questions expecting answers i should expect to respond to specific questions with specific answers as much as possible and not allow myself to get frustrated
  15. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    i always find it pathetic when people like RD and 7 here attempt to discuss science when they are ignorant of the topic
  16. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    ahhh, so you just don’t understand evolution. individuals don’t evolve. populations evolve.
  17. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    what does “branched out” mean? what do you think taxonomy is?
  18. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    more suggestions that you did not read the article. if you read it you would at least be aware of the term hominin and might have been curious enough to find out what it means do you really think ewoks and the tooth fairy are real?
  19. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    hominin is a simple taxonomic term. look it up
Top