Search results

reminds me of the word of faith theology “You are gods” Psalm 82:6 / John 10:34 if God infallibly knows their choice of "they did not repent" who is responsible for "they did not repent" God or the unrepentant open theist don't believe in foreknowledge , so open theist deny a mechanism ,they...

not prediction its more than that , has to be foreknowledge such as spear in the side , no broken bones , cast lots for clothing , hands and feet pierced , vinegar to drink , crucified between criminals , flogging and revelation and Daniel are what must take place Rev 4:1 currently watching

this to open theism is fact , God did not know Genesis 18:21) I will go down now and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which has come to Me. And if not, I will know this to open theism is God knew but didn't know (Genesis 13:13) But the men of Sodom were wicked...

15 this would be presupposition :The vision itself portrays what might happen in actual history if the relevant circumstances do not change. 16 this would be presupposition : the vision was not intended as an infallible recording of unalterable future history ( i added "not" as that is the open...

"Open theists always want to say that God's foreknowledge does conflict with human freedom" if he had it , with the "Rev 9:20-21 they did not repent" which is clearly foreknowledge the open theist applies their presupposition of God has no foreknowledge and viola no proof text for you therefore...

says the guy putting in less effort , hypocrisy well now I understand open theism eisegesis takes a few favorite verses Genesis 22:12 “Now I know ” open theism uses "now I know" , can only be interpreted as God doesn't know the future which = not settled Then via eisegesis apply that to...

well now I understand open theism eisegesis takes a few favorite verses Genesis 22:12 “Now I know ” open theism uses "now I know" , can only be interpreted as God doesn't know the future which = not settled Then via eisegesis apply that to Revelation chapters 4-22 to wave them away while...

true (Matthew 10:29) “Two sparrows are sold for a penny, aren't they? Yet not one of them will fall to the ground without your Father's permission. God is keeping track of an estimated 50 Billion birds today but couldn't keep track of the only two people on the earth

and Jeremiah 18 “if that nation repents, I will relent” open theism uses “if that nation repents, I will relent” as prophecy is not settled once you say "they did not repent" may or may not be true you're off the reservation you are saying the whole book of Revelation may or may not be true

you are the one that says it takes a thousand years to eat a piece of fruit to avoid the truth of spiritual death at the fall of man ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (II Timothy 3:7) Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth what did I get wrong? well now I understand open theism...

well now I understand open theism eisegesis takes a few favorite verses Genesis 22:12 “Now I know ”Gen 3:9 "where are you" and Jeremiah 18 “if that nation repents, I will relent” and makes them the controlling presupposition for the entire Bible. as an open theist you must accept God doesn't...

God already determined the course its a rhetorical question. so that's open theism denying scripture with the special pleading of " it's prophecy" God doesn't know what is talking about the same God who in the old testament established himself by prophecy and called for the death penalty for...

bad example God knew . (Genesis 18:17) And the LORD said, Shall I hide from Abraham that thing which I do; you acknowledge the words "did not repent" but not what they mean no God's belief does not transfer to their ability to repent God knows their free choice, they have the ability...

how does God determine what he doesn't want to know , without knowing ? believe what " define "that" you say one thing but mean something else you acknowledge the words "did not repent" but not what they mean I understand the argument ,modal fallacy The only necessity is God's belief...

it's God has exhaustive infallible foreknowledge or is he limited like a human this is God's exhaustive infallible foreknowledge not limited human knowledge (Revelation of John 9:20-21) [20] And the rest of the men who were not killed by these plagues still did not repent of the works of their...

https://substack.com/@coffeeandcovid/p-207156609 🔥 Trump 2.0 Accomplishments (as of mid-July 2026) 🔥 USAID and the “Institute for Peace” closed Negative net migration for the first time in 50 years 2.6 million+ illegal aliens removed (including 650,000 arrests and 400,000...

open theist don't believe God has foreknowledge but if God did then it would be a force the only necessity is God believing it modal fallacy , "will happen" and open theist switch it to "must happen" the necessity is in the truth of what God said will happen the necessity does not...

open theism tries to make foreknowledge a force the necessity is logical, not causal , foreknowledge is not a force the core philosophical error is modal fallacy God knows their choice of they did not repent they don't lack choice choice is not eliminated by God's foreknowledge Just...

foreknowledge is not a force The cause of them not repenting is their own free choice. Foreknowledge is not a force that makes them choose that way. It is necessarily true that if God foreknows they will not repent, then they will not repent. But the necessity is logical, not causal. Their own...

ad hominem what is the benefit God states what he will do and states what they do in response to the judgements by his infallible foreknowledge (Revelation of John 16:11) and they blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores; and they repented not of their works. more...