Derf's latest activity

No sir! I am purely and only and explicitly QUOTING the verse! It says what it says! You have to interpret it to say something that...

That's your doctrine talking. Do you remember when I said something about how it seems like almost all of the arguments supporting...

I am quoting scripture. Do you deny that Paul baptized people as late as Acts 18 and 19? That is your doctrinal position. You don't get...

Repeating your position does not count as a response to the argument. If "Any other baptism is a distraction that diverts attention...

There were negative effects in Corinth about communion, but that wasn't a reason to ignore Christ's teaching about it. So Paul didn't...

And where are these instructions not to water baptize? They don't exist. If they did, there would be no argument.

How much later can it be than Acts 19? Just how much past the period of time covered by Acts are you thinking these latest instructions...

Well, of course it makes perfect sense. That's the reason it was the very first thing Paul did once having been filled with the Spirit...

Hahahahahahaha. You are without a doubt the most divisive member of the body of Christ I know of. Right. So if the water baptism the...

It's a little ironic that you use the passage about "one baptism" to divide the body of Christ. Of course it would help with unity if...

The assumption is that Paul is NOT referring to water baptism, not that he was doing so! The natural reading would be for the original...

So, "not water" is not an argument. It's just a statement of your position. Having said that, my quoting the passages wasn't an argument...

That doesn't mean that they actually are. All of this is interpretation that is based on the premise that water baptism is invalid. It...