Why the case against Cosby is weak

musterion

Well-known member
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/12/opinions/holloway-cosby-case-how-strong/index.html

The opinion of a legal analyst for CNN.

Cosby is presumed to be innocent and the criminal accusation charging him with aggravated indecent assault is just that, an accusation. It is not evidence. The state must prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is the highest standard of proof known to law throughout the United States.

On its face, the case against Cosby is essentially a swearing contest between the only two people who know what, if anything, happened between them on some unknown date from mid-January to mid-February all the way back in 2004.

Do you remember what you were doing during that time frame 12 years ago? If you do, could you prove it beyond a reasonable doubt based on your memory alone?

Sexual assaults seldom occur in the presence of witnesses and frequently juries hear the insistence of a victim that the assault happened and the insistence of the accused that it either didn't happen or, if it did, that it was consensual. Since the accused is presumed innocent, a tie goes to the defendant and an acquittal is required.
However, he concludes by saying it's what Cosby himself has said that is the biggest threat to his defense.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
"Cosby is presumed to be innocent"

perhaps that's still true in the court system

in the court of public opinion?

not a chance, especially if the accusation is feminist-friendly (or, more broadly, liberal friendly)
 
Top