GFR7
New member
He plays dumb because he is a passive-aggressive idiot. lain:I was talking about you, not at you aCW, which as we all know would be a waste of time. lain:
He plays dumb because he is a passive-aggressive idiot. lain:I was talking about you, not at you aCW, which as we all know would be a waste of time. lain:
My rhetorical question was to show why it could not ever become a reality. :duh:
I don't have any buddies there. :nono:aCultureWarrior said:Tell your buddies in Provincetown not to lick their disease ridden chops just yet GFR7, as there is one huge obstacle that stands between perverts and innocent children:
People like me.
:rotfl: :rotfl:"Tell your buddies in Provincetown not to lick their disease ridden chops just yet GFR7,
as there is one huge obstacle that stands between perverts and innocent children:
People like me."
I don't have any buddies there. :nono:
Anyway, there is an army of liberal feminist social workers, advocates, and educators who have made a huge, vast industry of "protecting minors form adult sex" - where have you been the past 30 years?
THEY are the ones who will prevent this from happening:
With support from the myriad of laws and criminal statutes prosecuting
adults who take sexual advantage of minors (with severer penalties for cases where youth are under the ages of 14 or 15,
and especially minors under the age of 12).
The work these people and legal experts did will prevent this; not YOU.
You have not even been able to stop the gay agenda at any point.
aCW is a legend in his own mind; so full of self-importance
:chuckle:
I mean, really: :think: Seriously? :
:rotfl: :rotfl:
Hold that thought Al as GFR7 (who tried so very hard to play both sides) is going to come back with whether he thinks those who engage in homosexual behavior are born that way or not.
Perhaps this can be settled by telling us when you actually made a conscious choice to "decide" on your orientation?
:think:
Yes, I have always said I was against the whole LGBTQ pushing their agenda in the schools. I posted a thread about UK's Labour pushing this now on 5 year olds, and no one responded. :idunno:
I think it's very bad indeed. :nono:
Notwithstanding: You cannot deny sexual acts with minors (especially 14 and under) is now prosecuted severely in the US - the criminal statutes are clear. How would this change?
Welcome back (again) Art. GFR7's boycott lasted longer than yours.
As I've shown numerous times throughout the thread: Often times children you have been sexually molested or have been raised in a disfunctional household turn to homosexuality.
Being that I wasn't exposed to either, my sexual interests are what God designed for human sexuality.
Your turn Art. At what age did you first start defending homosexuality on internet websites?
Oh I don't boycott your thread doofus. I just wade in as and when I feel like it, you should know that by now...
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4203040&postcount=5217Dear everyone,
Kindly stop arguing in this magnificent blog thread.
Sorry, I meant to say malignant thread blog.
Ah, so you're saying that were you exposed to anything like the above you could have chosen to be homosexual and didn't in fact choose at any point to like the opposite sex because you weren't? What of all the homosexuals who haven't been exposed to such either or is that just too much of a disconnect for you to even entertain?
Well you've still not really answered my own question but if by 'defending' you mean from persecution by those who would see such killed then around 2006 on here. Ironically you would also fit under the same category as as whacked out as you are you don't actually support the DP for homosexuality right? To other people you'd count as a "homosexualist" for not going far enough in your crusade...
Irony, gotta love it sometimes...
Oh, I must have misunderstood this post then:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4203040&postcount=5217
Thanks for wading in to my little ole malignant thread blog again Art.
Case in point: Part 3's most important thread showing what happened to an innocent little boy:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4064685&postcount=2473
and what he's become because of it:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4210912&postcount=5324
(Sigh, I really did miss Art Brain's drama queen rants while he was away).
Perhaps this can be settled by telling us when you actually made a conscious choice to "decide" on your orientation?
Don't push him. He's still deciding.
I say sirrah, one was merely trying to avoid deflecting traffic away from one's so ultra commendable purpose in originating this skidding tyre tread - thread.
Mmmm, still not answering the question put to you but no real surprise there again...
Aw, now no need to 'shoot the messenger' aCW. You know fine well that certain elements here think you're far too soft on your position regarding homosexuals...
Don't push him. He's still deciding.
As usual with aCW, the few people who are to the "right" of him are heartless scumbags who have no compassion, and the many people who are to the "left" of him are heartless scumbags who want chaos and the undermining of society.
So perhaps you also have to struggle with incest too aCW, not just in choosing your own sexual orientation?There is one thing that I remember from my early childhood barbarian:
That my sister was never meant to be my girlfriend.
One would think that at your age you'd know that as well.