Vote Al Qaeda, Vote Democrat!

Something that's always been mystifying that perhaps there's somebody that can explain, adding would only like to hear an explanation from somebody who knows how the government works in some matters, firsthand, not from some legendary Googler. But if you know anything about security, for somebody to get a high clearance a background check is done. It's not just a records search, it's polygraphs, it's going out and interviewing a candidate’s neighbors, friends, going through the chain of personal connections. One thing terribly frowned upon is having connections to a foreign national. You can have a problem if it's an entirely innocent friendship, especially if that person is from a nation not considered a friend of the U.S. or rogue, in any way. In other words, knowing a Brit is one thing, a Bulgarian, Egyptian, Venezuelan or Saudi another. If you have any ongoing association, no matter the nature of the association, from a less than desirable nation, you will most likely be denied a security clearance. You cannot have this in your personal life. You may add to that any sort of activity in your past, like criminal or sexual, you could be blackmailed over. Also, if you've lied about anything, forget about it.

What is mystifying is we've had 9/11, yet Obama has had the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House. It's not just some perverse relationship with enemies of the nation, it's also been arming Al Qaeda and Al Qaeda type organizations, seeking their empowerment in the likes of Syria, the attempted radicalization of Egypt. Then, as if that wasn't totally bizarre and enough, offering aid and support to the Iranians, even blatantly illegal cash dumps on the Iranians (while Congress is too busy stuffing their own pockets), arming both sides, in other words, where Sunni and Shite are at each other's throats, and such the reason the Middle East has devolved into bloody chaos, with chunks of Europe being reduced to chaos, with, what has become a rogue U.S. government, favoring the terrorist Sunni at this writing, the Satanic cult that crashes jet airplanes into skyscrapers and has no qualms at murdering thousands of innocents.

If you can't smell a Saudi in the picture, you're a dolt, and 9/11 arose out of Sunni Saudi Arabia. So, how could Hillary Clinton ever get a security clearance, connected to terrorist suspects and on their payroll? The fact is, by her illegal handling of classified material, she would never get a security clearance on those counts alone, never, absolutely never. Explain how this works, that a person can be considered for President with terrorist connections, who violates security to hide her communications from government scrutiny, yet such a person could not be considered for a janitor at the CIA or NSA. Explain the abject stupidity America can consider somebody who's been on the terrorist payroll for the White House, after the likes of 9/11. How does any Muslim even get close to Pennsylvania Avenue? Again, these are questions for somebody who actually knows how government security works, how tight and unforgiving it is for people with far, far less power than a President, yet the Muslim Brotherhood is allowed in the White House? What good is government security, if the fox is selected to guard the hen house? Somebody who wouldn't have a prayer of getting a security clearance, for a veritable host of reasons, can be awarded the whole enchilada? Are we stupid, or are we stupid?

Check out the video, as always, the hits just keep coming. Hillary will be first to tell you the U.S. government doesn't pay like the Saudis, and it's obvious who owns her, beyond George Soros. If nothing else, it's great entertainment, if nothing else more bizarrely interesting than fiction, what has been going on in peoples' faces, how the graves of the 9/11 victims are danced on, as the American people consider electing a known associate of Islamic terrorists, on the Saudi payroll, and, "What, me worry?" Incredible. It has to be God's judgment, turned over to gay old, reprobate minds, Romans 1.
 
(Visual material bumped for, hopefully, better viewing at some point, as AdChoices sucks half your post into its black hole...)

12_what_me_worry.png

And now, for our feature presentation:

Video URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXG_h765ZBA&feature=youtu.be



obama-muslim-2-610x400.jpg


3RgNOUF.jpg


obama-suckers.jpg
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Nice OP WFJ, did you write that yourself or by chance did you copy and paste it without giving credit to it's author?

If you're in one of those rare moods where you actually respond to my posts, what are your thoughts on KGB/FSB-Al Qaeda connections?
 
Nice OP WFJ, did you write that yourself or by chance did you copy and paste it without giving credit to it's author?

If you're in one of those rare moods where you actually respond to my posts, what are your thoughts on KGB/FSB-Al Qaeda connections?

Every single word of it myself, CultureWhorior. Regrettably, I am not in one of those rare moods, today more willing to do something more productive, like stare out the window, to possibly catch a glimpse of some airborne pigs.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Every single word of it myself, CultureWhorior. Regrettably, I am not in one of those rare moods, today more willing to do something more productive, like stare out the window, to possibly catch a glimpse of some airborne pigs.

Impressive! For someone that writes such long posts, your attention span needs some work, as you must have missed the 2nd part to my post:

...what are your thoughts on KGB/FSB-Al Qaeda connections?

This is where we start talking about all of those trips that Donald Trump made to Russia (and it wasn't solely for him to find a porno actress wife).
 
Impressive! For someone that writes such long posts, your attention span needs some work, as you must have missed the 2nd part to my post:

...what are your thoughts on KGB/FSB-Al Qaeda connections?

This is where we start talking about all of those trips that Donald Trump made to Russia (and it wasn't solely for him to find a porno actress wife).

I relented and did look this up for you, LiberalCultureShill, since your playbook is painfully moldered:

https://theintercept.com/2016/08/08...and-russia-sympathies-has-long-history-in-us/

By the way, have you considered changing this anti-homo tactic and shilling for Hillary, at the same time? The old John Kerry, "I voted for moral, before I voted against moral..." routine is transparent and universally considered lame. As a matter of fact, aside from the disingenuous stance of being against homosexuality, while, at the same time, working feverishly to try to get a single convert to installing the homos' certified liberal queen of perversion in the Oval Office, just some liberal getting too rabidly anti-homo, and you can run up against, "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." You've, for quite sometime, really seemed ambiguously gay, for such reasons, flashing in neon pastels.

Just thought I'd help you add a little polish to your act, which is really in the doldrums, which you're, apparently, oblivious to. You can thank me later. And the Russian boogeyman thing? Very old, very lame.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Impressive! For someone that writes such long posts, your attention span needs some work, as you must have missed the 2nd part to my post:

...what are your thoughts on KGB/FSB-Al Qaeda connections?

This is where we start talking about all of those trips that Donald Trump made to Russia (and it wasn't solely for him to find a porno actress wife).

I relented and did look this up for you, LiberalCultureShill, since your playbook is painfully moldered:

https://theintercept.com/2016/08/08/...history-in-us/

Nice article, except that it doesn't talk about Donald Trump's Russian connections and the connections that the KGB/FSB has with militant Islam/Al Qaeda. I've documented them in another thread (the one that gives you heartburn every time your rainbow colored glasses glance at it).

Would you care to address the topic at hand and not concentrate on attempting to smear the messenger? (It's an old tactic of the left, smear the messenger and avoid talking about the truth).

By the way, have you considered changing this anti-homo tactic and shilling for Hillary, at the same time? The old John Kerry, "I voted for moral, before I voted against moral..." routine is transparent and universally considered lame. As a matter of fact, aside from the disingenuous stance of being against homosexuality, while, at the same time, working feverishly to try to get a single convert to installing the homos' certified liberal queen of perversion in the Oval Office, just some liberal getting too rabidly anti-homo, and you can run up against, "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." You've, for quite sometime, really seemed ambiguously gay, for such reasons, flashing in neon pastels.

My my, yet another TOL'er that is taking my 4 part thread on the recriminalization of homosexuality a tad bit hard. (WLJ reminds me so much of a Libertarian that I frequently have conversations with here on TOL).

While the subject title of this thread deals with Islamic terrorism, if you want to talk about Donald Trump's LGBTQ ties, we can do that as well.

Just thought I'd help you add a little polish to your act, which is really in the doldrums, which you're, apparently, oblivious to. You can thank me later. And the Russian boogeyman thing? Very old, very lame.

Now we're getting somewhere: "The Russian boogeyman". You mean the same Russia that has as it's leader the former head of the mass murdering KGB?

quote-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-former-kgb-man-vladimir-putin-260702.jpg

http://izquotes.com/quotes-pictures...as-a-former-kgb-man-vladimir-putin-260702.jpg
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Putin says Trump is ‘absolute leader’ in U.S. presidential race

Dec. 17, 2015

MOSCOW — Russian President Vladimir Putin found a moment Thursday during a wide-ranging news conference to offer a strong endorsement of Republican front-runner Donald Trump, calling the billionaire presidential candidate the “absolute leader in the presidential race.”
Putin consecrated a budding international bromance between the two men as he commented on the U.S. campaign for the White House, saying that Russia would work with “whomever the American voters choose” but expressing special praise for Trump.
Trump said in October that he would “get along very well” with Putin and applauded the Russian leader for his intervention against the Islamic State in Syria. But until Thursday, Trump’s praise had gone unreciprocated.
“He’s a very lively man, talented without doubt,” Putin said when journalists approached him after the news conference and asked about Trump. “He’s saying he wants to go to another level of relations — closer, deeper relations with Russia. How can we not welcome that? Of course we welcome that.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...78255e-a431-11e5-8318-bd8caed8c588_story.html

Now that we've established who the Russian boogeyman is endorsing (actually, boogeymen are just a myth, a mass murdering President of Russia is a fact), can we continue with the Donald Trump/Vladimir Putin connection and Russia's ties with radical Islam WLJ?

Or maybe you've suddenly drifted off into one of those moods where you just don't want to talk?
 

WANTED: Small American investment group seeking interest in up and coming news network. "Clear and unbiased" paradigm of American antiquity preferred. Outside U.S. borders only. Banana republics, if free of CIA involvement and free of AP news wires, acceptable. It's 2016. Beggars can't be choosers.
 
Or maybe you've suddenly drifted off into one of those moods where you just don't want to talk?

image.php


"Lastly, I would like to thank aCultureWhorior for this drop cloth."

No, as a matter of fact, I'm thrilled you've finally decided to come out of the closet to own your condition! No longer the avatar which, presumably, was you, standing in a field of corpses, they presumably bored to death? So, will you be taking a trip on the Lolita Express with Bill, Hillary or some other Clintonista buddies over the holidays? It's shaping up you guys could have a lot of free time on your hands.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Or maybe you've suddenly drifted off into one of those moods where you just don't want to talk?

image.php


"Lastly, I would like to thank aCultureWhorior for this drop cloth."

No, as a matter of fact, I'm thrilled you've finally decided to come out of the closet to own your condition! No longer the avatar which, presumably, was you, standing in a field of corpses, they presumably bored to death? So, will you be taking a trip on the Lolita Express with Bill, Hillary or some other Clintonista buddies over the holidays? It's shaping up you guys could have a lot of free time on your hands.

How novel, a left wing Libertarian (I know, the term is redundant) who can't defend his secular humanist Presidential candidate plays the "you're closeted homosexual!" card.

LOL...it didn't work with the thousands that tried that tactic before you, it certainly isn't working now.

For someone who gives himself so much credit for being intelligent, I thought that you might actually come up with some defense of Donald Trump.

But then I'm known for over estimating left wingers intelligence quite frequently.

Back to the drawing board for you.
 
My, my looks like WLJ is covering her butt, seems now she is edging away from her "uhhh, girl friend, Hilary" and is running down the middle road————mostly just pompous babble, loose associations, i.e. disconnected thought processes.
There's a sophisticated name for people like WLJ, "poseur" almost like a snob.

People who lack principles are generally out-come oriented.


JMJ

Paxconturbatus! Good to see your liver has survived another day! And no contest, hands down, I must bow to your expertise with regard to loose associations and disconnected thought processes, and will forego disabusing you of some other things, so as not to tilt your already delicate mental balance. That would not be Christian. Catholic maybe.
 
Top