In MAD they say there has to be a
..
:doh:
That right there is the very heart of why you are so clueless about MAD, together with your frequent admission you have not really bothered looking into MAD.
This nonsense of yours that "In MAD they say there has to be a..." only reveals how incompetent you are at looking at another's words objevtively.
Bad enough you are going by your fool misunderstanding of what is often actually Acts 2 Dispy assertions you also are clearly clueless about the actually intended sense of.
But this consistently imbecilic practice of yours of allowing yourself to read into another's words "they are really saying this or that has to be in order for system to work" only merits the disrespect towards your supposed thinking through on these things that you continue bring on yourself by your continued incompetence.
Other than when a MAD is being as incompetent as you continue to prove yourself to be, MAD is not about needing a thing to have to be.
My sense of MAD is, for example, is a MAD, that is "more or less."
Meaning, moron, I do not need it to have to be anything but what light the next day brings.
You are as bad off as all those world wide, well known expert archeologists; historians; and scholars you continue to obviously so highly worship over the Scripture.
The overwhelming majority of whom continue to assert to this very day, that the Exodus did not happen, despite clear evidence they all are the one's wrong, due to their obstinate insistence on looking at things some two hundred years in the wrong direction.
You are useless at your chosen vendetta; what an absolute hack you are at it :chuckle: