Interplanner
Well-known member
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS3vpAWW2Zc
The real issue of this Isaiah 9 passage is not whether it is saying the kingdom of God always was--even in the OT--in Christ. That much is clear. The issue is why was the statement needed: the government/kingdom will be upon his shoulders?
That's because 2P2P was already in motion in the 7th century BC and the prophet needed to make clear that the kingdom he was referring to was not going to be the state of Israel as they knew it. It wasn't even going to be a certain sector of Hebrews first of all. It was going to be on His shoulders--Emmanuel's, ie, God with us. Meaning, some of Israel would see/realize this, but the prize was bigger: it was going to be 'to small a thing to restore the fortunes of Israel / I will make you (the Servant) a light to the nations' So it always was going to resonate with the world wide reach of Genesis 3 and 12, not be a 2nd program. It was never meant to confuse the Bible in to a contorted nightmare of divisions and exceptions and non-meaning.
But 2P2P moved forward and Paul had to attack it, as he did in Gal 3:17 with the full force of declaring it to be replacement theology. The world wide offer of the grace of God was replaced with a 2nd program about Israel as a state, about Judaism. That needed to be defeated, because the reign was already 'upon His/Christ's shoulders' and he was already the Counselor, the Peace, the Mighty God.
The real issue of this Isaiah 9 passage is not whether it is saying the kingdom of God always was--even in the OT--in Christ. That much is clear. The issue is why was the statement needed: the government/kingdom will be upon his shoulders?
That's because 2P2P was already in motion in the 7th century BC and the prophet needed to make clear that the kingdom he was referring to was not going to be the state of Israel as they knew it. It wasn't even going to be a certain sector of Hebrews first of all. It was going to be on His shoulders--Emmanuel's, ie, God with us. Meaning, some of Israel would see/realize this, but the prize was bigger: it was going to be 'to small a thing to restore the fortunes of Israel / I will make you (the Servant) a light to the nations' So it always was going to resonate with the world wide reach of Genesis 3 and 12, not be a 2nd program. It was never meant to confuse the Bible in to a contorted nightmare of divisions and exceptions and non-meaning.
But 2P2P moved forward and Paul had to attack it, as he did in Gal 3:17 with the full force of declaring it to be replacement theology. The world wide offer of the grace of God was replaced with a 2nd program about Israel as a state, about Judaism. That needed to be defeated, because the reign was already 'upon His/Christ's shoulders' and he was already the Counselor, the Peace, the Mighty God.