Texas Superintendents Vote to Require Athletes to Show Birth Certificates (gender)

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
Texas Superintendents Vote to Require Athletes to Show Birth Certificates to Prove Gender

AUSTIN, Texas — School district superintendents in Texas recently voted to require student athletes to provide proof of their gender by submitting a copy of their birth certificate.

The new policy, passed by a 586-32 vote, ensures that boys do not play on girls’ teams and girls do not play on boys’ teams.

“Member schools may not permit boys to try out for or participate under the jr. high school or high school athletic plans designated for girls’ teams,” the policy reads, noting the same for girls. “Member schools that offer cross country, golf, swimming, tennis, track and field and/or wrestling individual athletic plans may not permit mixed plans for boys and girls.”

It also prohibits boys and girls from wrestling against each other.

“Gender shall be determined based on a student’s birth certificate,” the policy requires. “In cases where a student’s birth certificate is unavailable, other similar government document used for the purpose of identification may be substituted.”

“The background behind it, the reasoning behind it, is to just create a level playing field and to make sure that nobody gains an advantage,” Brad Thiessen, Athletic Director at Amarillo Independent School District, told KFDA-TV. “With that kept in mind, the birth certificate is the easiest way to determine gender.”

But transgender advocacy organizations have condemned the move, stating that it will require those who identify as transgender to obtain new birth certificates. The groups state that doing so is costly and takes time, and would deny some students “an equal opportunity.”

“At the high school level, we should be encouraging participation for all students,” Chris Mosier, the founder of TransAthlete.com, told the Associated Press. “Texas school leaders have a responsibility to ensure that transgender athletes can participate in a way that is safe, comfortable and affirming of their identity.”

But others are supportive of the requirement. Peter Sprigg, the Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the Washington, D.C.-based Family Research Council, said that schools are right to separate the genders.

“Our position at FRC is that government entities, including schools, have no obligation to recognize a change in gender identity from the biological sex at birth,” he told the Baptist Press. “This is especially important when it comes to athletics because there are undeniable physical differences between the sexes.”

“From a Christian perspective, the Bible says several times ‘male and female He created them’ and this is a part of the created order,” Sprigg continued. “From a theological perspective, to seek to change one’s gender is a rebellion against God’s created order.”

He said that students who are struggling with their gender identity should be offered compassionate counseling to “help them overcome these feelings rather than simply indulging feelings that are contrary to nature.”

“Common sense is thrown out the window in our politically correct culture,” Steve McConkey of the Wisconsin-based 4 Winds Christian Athletics also said in a statement. “A 6’10” male basketball player who decides to play as a female has skeletal and muscular advantages that would take years to reverse by hormones. The P.C. advocates avoid this subject or give faulty research trying to prove their point.”

The new policy is expected to go into effect on Aug. 1.

How sad that its come to this that specific instructions about what should be obvious needs to be needed.
 

rexlunae

New member
The new policy, passed by a 586-32 vote, ensures that boys do not play on girls’ teams and girls do not play on boys’ teams.

Actually, it does the opposite of that. It ensures that some girls will only be allowed to play on boys' teams and vice versa.
 

Greg Jennings

New member
Texas Superintendents Vote to Require Athletes to Show Birth Certificates to Prove Gender



How sad that its come to this that specific instructions about what should be obvious needs to be needed.
I think this has more to do with those born with ambiguous genitalia, or hermaphrodites, than with people struggling with "gender identity." They had to strip a female sprinter who won a medal three or four Olympics ago of her award because testing showed she had internal testes, and therefore wasn't technically a woman though she appeared to be one physically. Those are the kind of situations I imagine this thing is meant to address
 

kmoney

New member
Hall of Fame
Makes sense, as it concerns competitive purposes. Then again, how often would this really come up? :idunno:
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
Makes sense, as it concerns competitive purposes. Then again, how often would this really come up? :idunno:

I would imagine a lot more often now that many states are allowing people to determine their own gender and parents can determine their childs gender based on their own criteria other than what sex they actually are by their genitalia.
 

rexlunae

New member
Hows that?

A transman, taking testosterone, will have many of the physical characteristics of any other man, many of which have implications for performance in sporting events. And then there's going to be the spectacle of a "woman", by your definition, running down the track muscled and bearded.
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
A transman, taking testosterone, will have many of the physical characteristics of any other man, many of which have implications for performance in sporting events. And then there's going to be the spectacle of a "woman", by your definition, running down the track muscled and bearded.


Do give that information, thanks. When you have decided to speak for me, speak it all.
 

rexlunae

New member
Do give that information, thanks. When you have decided to speak for me, speak it all.

What information? Your definition? Well, you mentioned genitals in your recent post. And the thread refers to birth certificates. Either of those definitions would lead to what I described.
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
What information? Your definition? Well, you mentioned genitals in your recent post. And the thread refers to birth certificates. Either of those definitions would lead to what I described.


My definition lest there be any confusion, since liberals have strange defintions for simple concepts then assume others believe theirs:

mine:

if you have a penis when you are born, you are male, if you have a vagina, you are female. These truths do not change no matter what social life (your parents, others, worldview, molestation, perversion etc...) has done to you.
 

Greg Jennings

New member
My definition lest there be any confusion, since liberals have strange defintions for simple concepts then assume others believe theirs:

mine:

if you have a penis when you are born, you are male, if you have a vagina, you are female. These truths do not change no matter what social life (your parents, others, worldview, molestation, perversion etc...) has done to you.
I tend to agree in nearly all situations.
However, what if you're born with ambiguous genitalia? Some people are born with an organ that cannot be distinguished as male or female. It's a hodgepodge
 

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
It is a fact men are on average more physically stronger, brazen, and tolerant to pain than women.

But depend on progressive nonsense and feminist ideology to pretend this is not the case, and that complaints like this have value and aren't absolutely hilarious detachments from reality:

prohibits boys and girls from wrestling against each other

There's a reason why sports are gender specific, and it has nothing to do with prejudice.

But if some agenda wants to push against others, I don't find anything wrong with push back- liberals need to be pushed back, and ignored when they cry 'persecution!' in their pitiful hypocrisy.
In fact, they act a lot like many women.. what a correlation :think:
 
Top