Secular geobiology and geologic history are in conflict

[Interplanner]

[Sorry the correct first term should have been biogeography.]

This isn't conflict about bits and pieces of fossil skeleton reconstruction! This is about two major secular fields of science being in total conflict, irreconcilable.

https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search...e+flood&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-002

The issues involved dovetail in Genesis 1-11 because the Creator graphed (wrote) that.

 

[TracerBullet]

This isn't conflict about bits and pieces of fossil skeleton reconstruction! This is about two major secular fields of science being in total conflict, irreconcilable.

https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search...e+flood&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-002

what does this have to do with either geology or biology?

 

[Interplanner]

Everything. Actually the first term should have been biogeography. If you are not familiar, you'll be in for a wave of integration of knowledge that has a lot of traction.

I assume, like most people here, that your reaction is before viewing the presentation, not after. If you are asking your question afterward, there is nothing to talk about.

As far as the general approach of evolution goes, it is pretty much 19th century nonsense funded by upper English classes to feel good about being the superior race. It is very bad science.