Q believers/right wing extremists at Capitol building on Jan. 6

[Gary K]

Despite all the lies broadcast from the left there were no conspiracy theorists at the Capitol building riot. Of course, everyone with a brain already knew this. Only the far left blueanons believed this insanity.

I say, science, because all the leftists on this site say there has to be "studies" to show anything. Well, there is now study that shows who was actually at the capitol.

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Hilltrot]

From my point of view, this article supports leftists.

Q-Anon has disappeared as was expected. Now, the base people who made it up are still around and have been since Pizzagate and before. There are always going to be people who believe the Twin Towers were rigged with explosives.

What this article does is deflect blame away from Q-Anon and put it on Parler and Proud Boys. It does this by quoting and referencing a slanted research paper which was specifically designed to have this exact effect.

Parler and Proud Boys are still valid organizations. Proud Boys is hanging on by a thread. Parler is trying to survive and grow. Both of these have actual known people working in them. Q-Anon could be George Soros for all we know. Q-Anon was recognized as a leftist tool by Tucker Carlsen this year, Barnes in 2020, and Wikileaks as far back as 2018. Throwing Proud Boys and Parler under the bus to save Q-Anon seems like a very leftist thing to do.

 

[Gary K]

From my point of view, this article supports leftists.

Q-Anon has disappeared as was expected. Now, the base people who made it up are still around and have been since Pizzagate and before. There are always going to be people who believe the Twin Towers were rigged with explosives.

What this article does is deflect blame away from Q-Anon and put it on Parler and Proud Boys. It does this by quoting and referencing a slanted research paper which was specifically designed to have this exact effect.

Parler and Proud Boys are still valid organizations. Proud Boys is hanging on by a thread. Parler is trying to survive and grow. Both of these have actual known people working in them. Q-Anon could be George Soros for all we know. Q-Anon was recognized as a leftist tool by Tucker Carlsen this year, Barnes in 2020, and Wikileaks as far back as 2018. Throwing Proud Boys and Parler under the bus to save Q-Anon seems like a very leftist thing to do.

I spent a good 6 months reading Q and Q research. I learned a lot from there in terms of history, and I'm a big time history buff. I also found a lot on the Fed that agreed with the research and reading I have personally done on the Fed. The other thing I found there was a very decided emphasis on personal research, learning, and critical thinking. That's not a leftist idea. That's exactly the opposite of what socialists want people to do. That's a conservative ideal.

There were also a lot of leftist trolls there that were out to do nothing but disrupt the site.

I've also spent a couple of years doing research into 9/11. That was not what it seemed. Have you seen the videos of steel beams turning to dust in mid air? Have you seen the pictures of cars with the front of cop cars burnt right up to the light bar with the plastic lenses on the light bar showing no signs of heat damage? That does not happen with natural fire. There are also videos of supposedly melting steel from it's reddish-orange glow but not generating enough heat to burn the paper lying on top of it. Have you watched building 5 fall at free fall speed? How about the lack of rubble on the site? Two buildings that size left a very small rubble pile. And, there was a larger earth tremor from the fall of the domed stadium in Seattle than from the fall of either of the twin towers. That's an impossibility.

It's pretty obvious you haven't dug very deeply into the evidence that exists from the collapse of the towers. And how did the "bathtub" withstand the impact of all those tons debris from the twin towers. It was never built to withstand that kind of shock. It should have been destroyed and all of underground NYC flooded.

Also, have you seen Judy Woods forensic analysis of the 9/11 events? I'd like to see you debunk them.

There are a ton of unexplained physical evidence if the government explanations are to be believed.
There are things that happened there that the government explanations cannot make sense of the evidence. There are a lot of structural engineers that do not believe NIST's explanations. I don't either. 9/11 makes no sense from government explanations when it is studied closely.

 

[marke]

From my point of view, this article supports leftists.

Q-Anon has disappeared as was expected. Now, the base people who made it up are still around and have been since Pizzagate and before. There are always going to be people who believe the Twin Towers were rigged with explosives.

What this article does is deflect blame away from Q-Anon and put it on Parler and Proud Boys. It does this by quoting and referencing a slanted research paper which was specifically designed to have this exact effect.

Parler and Proud Boys are still valid organizations. Proud Boys is hanging on by a thread. Parler is trying to survive and grow. Both of these have actual known people working in them. Q-Anon could be George Soros for all we know. Q-Anon was recognized as a leftist tool by Tucker Carlsen this year, Barnes in 2020, and Wikileaks as far back as 2018. Throwing Proud Boys and Parler under the bus to save Q-Anon seems like a very leftist thing to do.

Christians have always been falsely blamed throughout history for the wickedness and its damage caused by the ungodly. In the US it does not matter which size of the political divide the wicked stand on. Faithful Christians stand with God against homosexuality, abortion, communism, racism, lying, hatred, false accusations, voter fraud, false science, false religion, atheism, and so forth.

 

[Hilltrot]

I spent a good 6 months reading Q and Q research. I learned a lot from there in terms of history, and I'm a big time history buff. I also found a lot on the Fed that agreed with the research and reading I have personally done on the Fed. The other thing I found there was a very decided emphasis on personal research, learning, and critical thinking. That's not a leftist idea. That's exactly the opposite of what socialists want people to do. That's a conservative ideal.

Q wanted you to waste time researching nonsense. Socialists wanted you to do the same. Why do you think that they waited till after Trump was clearly defeated to pull the plug on Q?

There were also a lot of leftist trolls there that were out to do nothing but disrupt the site.

What site?

I've also spent a couple of years doing research into 9/11. That was not what it seemed. Have you seen the videos of steel beams turning to dust in mid air? Have you seen the pictures of cars with the front of cop cars burnt right up to the light bar with the plastic lenses on the light bar showing no signs of heat damage? That does not happen with natural fire.

And people who spread nonsense tend to kill innocent people.

Trial by Fire

From 2009: Cameron Todd Willingham was executed for a deadly case of arson. Was he innocent?

www.newyorker.com

That does not happen with natural fire.

This wasn't a forest fire - not that you know what happens with one of those either.

There are also videos of supposedly melting steel from it's reddish-orange glow but not generating enough heat to burn the paper lying on top of it. Have you watched building 5 fall at free fall speed?

I'm sure most everyone has seen the buildings fall.

How about the lack of rubble on the site?

Nope. There was definitely rumble.

And, there was a larger earth tremor from the fall of the domed stadium in Seattle than from the fall of either of the twin towers. That's an impossibility.

Nope.

It's pretty obvious you haven't dug very deeply into the evidence that exists from the collapse of the towers.

You haven't either.

And how did the "bathtub" withstand the impact of all those tons debris from the twin towers.

As they always say, follow the bathtub. Wait, they don't say that.

It was never built to withstand that kind of shock. It should have been destroyed and all of underground NYC flooded.

Thank goodness it was over-engineered.

Also, have you seen Judy Woods forensic analysis of the 9/11 events? I'd like to see you debunk them.

It wouldn't change your opinion if I did and I'm sure you know there are some who have.

Judy Woods is an academic studying a field unrelated to what happened on 9/11. Judy Woods is not only nuts, she is cuckoo for cocoa puffs nuts.

There are a ton of unexplained physical evidence if the government explanations are to be believed.

The explanation would require more knowledge than you have to understand.

There are things that happened there that the government explanations cannot make sense of the evidence.

They did make sense of the evidence.

There are a lot of structural engineers that do not believe NIST's explanations.

Less than a handful is not a lot. It is less than 0.1%.

I don't either.

Yes, I got that.

9/11 makes no sense from government explanations when it is studied closely.

Yes it does.

It definitely makes more sense than the government extracting the energy from a hurricane to blow up the Twin Towers with a secret laser in space.

People believe in this nonsense because reality upsets them too much. A lone nut with a cheap mail-order rifle couldn't have possibly succeeded in killing the president alone. A couple dozen religious immigrant nuts couldn't have possibly done that much damage in one day.

You're another example of why I say Q people aren't pro-Trump, They're just people who enjoy conspiracies at best, but more likely are dupes or nuts.

 

[Gary K]

Q wanted you to waste time researching nonsense. Socialists wanted you to do the same. Why do you think that they waited till after Trump was clearly defeated to pull the plug on Q?

What site?

And people who spread nonsense tend to kill innocent people.

Trial by Fire

From 2009: Cameron Todd Willingham was executed for a deadly case of arson. Was he innocent?

www.newyorker.com

This wasn't a forest fire - not that you know what happens with one of those either.

I'm sure most everyone has seen the buildings fall.

Nope. There was definitely rumble.

Nope.

You haven't either.

As they always say, follow the bathtub. Wait, they don't say that.

Thank goodness it was over-engineered.

It wouldn't change your opinion if I did and I'm sure you know there are some who have.

Judy Woods is an academic studying a field unrelated to what happened on 9/11. Judy Woods is not only nuts, she is cuckoo for cocoa puffs nuts.

The explanation would require more knowledge than you have to understand.

They did make sense of the evidence.

Less than a handful is not a lot. It is less than 0.1%.

Yes, I got that.

Yes it does.

It definitely makes more sense than the government extracting the energy from a hurricane to blow up the Twin Towers with a secret laser in space.

People believe in this nonsense because reality upsets them too much. A lone nut with a cheap mail-order rifle couldn't have possibly succeeded in killing the president alone. A couple dozen religious immigrant nuts couldn't have possibly done that much damage in one day.

You're another example of why I say Q people aren't pro-Trump, They're just people who enjoy conspiracies at best, but more likely are dupes or nuts.

I have to say this was a really good post if your goal was to demonstrate how little you think and know. It's nothing but proof you can't do any critical thinking.

I don't know how you can possibly state that the Q movement was socialist. There is evidence around you every day that position is false. Every socialist in existence was completely opposed to Q. All democrats, the entire mockingbird media, was constantly criticizing Q. They constantly called for the destruction of the Q site and Q. And we know socialists don't criticize their own. Do they criticize BLM and Antifa? Nope. They provide political and legal cover for them at all times. So your entire criticism of Q is based in logical fallacy and lies.

So, you think that an ad hominen attack is a refutation of everything Judy Woods says. More fallacy. And by the way, she makes zero claims that a "laser in space" knocked down the twin towers. Never said anything like it. That you lie about what she does say is telling. It's evidence you have never watched any of her video presentations or read any of her papers or that if you did you prefer to lie about what she did say.

Oh, and LOL. The fact that you think it's so hard to believe that Islamic terrorists knocked down the twin towers that it's easier to believe that our own government was involved in the destruction of the towers makes you completely ludicrous. I don't want to believe the deep state a large sections of our government are completely corrupt and anti-american. The evidence doesn't lead to any other conclusions. Only by ignoring all the evidence--a psychological barrier--can anyone believe the lies from our government.

Governmental assertion != truth. Anyone who disagrees with that is off in la la land.

 

[eider]

Despite all the lies broadcast from the left there were no conspiracy theorists at the Capitol building riot. Of course, everyone with a brain already knew this. Only the far left blueanons believed this insanity.

I say, science, because all the leftists on this site say there has to be "studies" to show anything. Well, there is now study that shows who was actually at the capitol.

Let's see what the BBC has reported......
Ouch!
You want to read the details of future trials and convictions, I'm thinking.

Here is an initial Beeb report :-

Capitol riot: Prosecutors get first guilty plea 100 days after attack

Heavy metal guitarist Jon Schaffer, a militia member, is facing 30 years in jail after pleading guilty.

www.bbc.co.uk

About 90% of those arrested have been white, according to an analysis by the Chicago Project on Security and Threats.
Most have been over the age of 40, surprising given that the average age for those involved in political violence around the world is late 20s to early 30s.
Many of those arrested were employed, or even wealthy, including Dr Simone Gold, 55, from Beverly Hills, California.
She was among a group of doctors that last year spread misleading claims about the coronavirus, including that hydroxychloroquine - a drug touted relentlessly by Mr Trump - was an effective treatment.
Jenna Ryan - a real estate broker from Dallas, Texas - garnered attention on social media after she flew to DC by private jet to join the march to the Capitol

 

[ok doser]

Let's see what the BBC has reported......

The BBC lies

 

[eider]

Christians have always been falsely blamed throughout history for the wickedness and its damage caused by the ungodly. In the US it does not matter which size of the political divide the wicked stand on. Faithful Christians stand with God against homosexuality, abortion, communism, racism, lying, hatred, false accusations, voter fraud, false science, false religion, atheism, and so forth.

Do you think that any of the Capitol rioters will be Christians?
We will wait and see.....

 

[marke]

Do you think that any of the Capitol rioters will be Christians?
We will wait and see.....

I suspect some Christians may have been swept up in the surge driven by mob emotion, but I don't think any committed any assaults on others like the unsaved radicals did.

 

[eider]

I suspect some Christians may have been swept up in the surge driven by mob emotion, but I don't think any committed any assaults on others like the unsaved radicals did.

We'll have to wait and see who gets convicted of what offences.

 

[marke]

We'll have to wait and see who gets convicted of what offences.

Jesus got convicted. I believe our current democrat judicial system could convict Anne Frank and exonerate Adolph Hitler.

 

[eider]

Jesus got convicted. I believe our current democrat judicial system could convict Anne Frank and exonerate Adolph Hitler.

Am I correct in thinking that you believe that your Democrat Leftist Judicial system is Fascist?

Do you support Antifa or something like that?

 

[marke]

Am I correct in thinking that you believe that your Democrat Leftist Judicial system is Fascist?

Do you support Antifa or something like that?

I do believe that a system in which innocent Americans are arrested and jailed for opposing leftist crimes and criminals and then convicted by leftist juries hearing evidence presented by leftist prosecutors before radical leftist judges is corrupt.

 

[eider]

I do believe that a system in which innocent Americans are arrested and jailed for opposing leftist crimes and criminals and then convicted by leftist juries hearing evidence presented by leftist prosecutors before radical leftist judges is corrupt.

You cannot have any pride in your country then.
Sad.....

 

[marke]

You cannot have any pride in your country then.
Sad.....

Just because I do not approve of crooks in politics and in the judicial system does not mean I cannot have pride in God Bless America.

 

[ok doser]

Just because I do not approve of crooks in politics and in the judicial system does not mean I cannot have pride in God Bless America.

Eider struggles so

 

[eider]

Just because I do not approve of crooks in politics and in the judicial system does not mean I cannot have pride in God Bless America.

Wouldn't you prefer to live in a land where you did approve of governments and judiciaries? .... Not that any might fit for you, of course.

 

[marke]

Wouldn't you prefer to live in a land where you did approve of governments and judiciaries? .... Not that any might fit for you, of course.

I would prefer to live where judges and politicians were not corrupt. It looks like that might be impossible from now on until the Lord returns to set up His Righteous Rule.

 

[Hilltrot]

I have to say this was a really good post if your goal was to demonstrate how little you think and know. It's nothing but proof you can't do any critical thinking.

A 9/11 truther has just called me names. Do, you have enough critical thinking skills to realize that your being a 9/11 truther makes everything you say worthless and silly?

I don't know how you can possibly state that the Q movement was socialist.

I never said it was a socialist movement.

I said it was a leftist tool and it was. They pointed to a Q-a-nut in a crowd with some Trump supporters and they grouped all the Trump supporters with them. The valid election cases were able to be ignored because Q-a-nuts spent their time pushing nonsense stuff which they had no proof for. Two lawyers Sidney Powell and Lin Wood are basically ruined for their idiotic support of Q-a-nuts. Leftist Pied-piper operation through and through.

There is evidence around you every day that position is false.

Nope.

Every socialist in existence was completely opposed to Q. All democrats, the entire mockingbird media, was constantly criticizing Q. They constantly called for the destruction of the Q site and Q.

Every socialist in existence loves it when someone they oppose latches onto Q. It makes them giddy with delight. Just look at Eider here. For him, it's like Christmas in March seeing all those people arrested and talking about Q-a-nuts on this forum. It's like shooting fish in a barrel.

And we know socialists don't criticize their own.

Tell Cuomo that. They criticize with a purpose. They waited to criticize Q-a-nuts until they could do it for maximum effect.

Do they criticize BLM and Antifa? Nope. They provide political and legal cover for them at all times.

They hold criticism until they no longer serve a purpose. See Brownshirts.

So your entire criticism of Q is based in logical fallacy and lies.

This from a 9-11 truther.

So, you think that an ad hominen attack is a refutation of everything Judy Woods says.

See the beginning of your post. Hypocritical much? And I stand by what I say, Judy Woods is cuckoo for cocoa puffs nuts.

More fallacy.

Nope, she's definitely nuts. But the way, have Judy Wood's films been banned from Youtube? What did you say about leftists not criticizing their own?

And by the way, she makes zero claims that a "laser in space" knocked down the twin towers. Never said anything like it. That you lie about what she does say is telling. It's evidence you have never watched any of her video presentations or read any of her papers or that if you did you prefer to lie about what she did say.

Star Wars Energy Weapons 1

www.drjudywood.com

Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs nuts

Oh, and LOL. The fact that you think it's so hard to believe that Islamic terrorists knocked down the twin towers that it's easier to believe that our own government was involved in the destruction of the towers makes you completely ludicrous.

On the contrary, you might want to read what I wrote again.

People believe in this nonsense because reality upsets them too much. A lone nut with a cheap mail-order rifle couldn't have possibly succeeded in killing the president alone. A couple dozen religious immigrant nuts couldn't have possibly done that much damage in one day.

I don't want to believe the deep state a large sections of our government are completely corrupt and anti-american.

That's not a stretch. I believe a lot of people in the government are corrupt and anti-American. Plenty of evidence for that.

The evidence doesn't lead to any other conclusions. Only by ignoring all the evidence--a psychological barrier--can anyone believe the lies from our government.

Governmental assertion != truth. Anyone who disagrees with that is off in la la land.

Don't be silly about it. People need to be skeptical of everything - just not insanely skeptical.