Sozo
New member
From cellist...
Here
You guys should really be reading his posts! This guy is incredible!
Note this...
"Rom 5 speaks of condemnation as the result of one transgression by the one man Adam. It also speaks of justification as the result of one act of righteousness by the one man Jesus Christ. You do not, in the final analysis, believe that condemnation came upon us all because of the one transgression. We need to add my own sin to Adam's to be condemned. If that is true, then I also need to add my own works of righteousness to Christ's to be justified. This would be the logical conclusion. There is sustained emphasis, like a recurring mantra, on the one sin of the one man. And it is crucial because to deny this is to put forensic justification in doubt."
Here
You guys should really be reading his posts! This guy is incredible!
Note this...
"Rom 5 speaks of condemnation as the result of one transgression by the one man Adam. It also speaks of justification as the result of one act of righteousness by the one man Jesus Christ. You do not, in the final analysis, believe that condemnation came upon us all because of the one transgression. We need to add my own sin to Adam's to be condemned. If that is true, then I also need to add my own works of righteousness to Christ's to be justified. This would be the logical conclusion. There is sustained emphasis, like a recurring mantra, on the one sin of the one man. And it is crucial because to deny this is to put forensic justification in doubt."