Oregon Judge Refuses To Perform Same-Sex Marriages

serpentdove

BANNED
Banned
[Oregon Judge Refuses To Perform Same-Sex Marriages by Jonathan J. Cooper Salem, Ore. AP] "Marion County Judge Vance Day is being investigated by a judicial fitness commission in part over his refusal to perform same-sex marriages on religious grounds, a spokesman for the judge said.

When a federal court ruling in May 2014 made same-sex marriage legal in Oregon, Day instructed his staff to refer same-sex couples looking to marry to other judges, spokesman Patrick Korten said Friday.

Last fall, he decided to stop performing weddings altogether, aside from one in March that had long been scheduled, Korten said.

"He made a decision nearly a year ago to stop doing weddings altogether, and the principal factor that he weighed was the pressure that one would face to perform a same-sex wedding, which he had a conflict with his religious beliefs," Korten said.

In an email, Day declined to comment and referred questions to Korten.

The issue of same-sex weddings is "the weightiest" of several allegations against Day that are being investigated by the Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability, Korten said.

He declined to detail any of the allegations, saying he didn't want to defy the commission, which considers complaints confidential until it is ready to make them public.

The investigation of Day's conduct comes amid heightened national attention to the responsibilities of public officials who oppose same-sex marriage. Kim Davis, a county clerk in Kentucky, went to jail Thursday because of her refusal to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

Last month, the Ohio Supreme Court's Board of Professional Conduct said judges can't refuse to marry same-sex couples on personal, moral or religious grounds.

Judges who stop performing all marriages to avoid marrying same-sex couples may be interpreted as biased and could be disqualified from any case where sexual orientation is an issue, the Ohio board ruled..." Full text: Oregon Judge Refuses To Perform Same-Sex Marriages

Homosexuality is: forbidden (Lev. 18:22), considered an abomination (1 Kin. 14:24), punishment for (Lev. 20:13), unclean (Rom. 1:24, 26, 27). :vomit:
 

Bright Raven

Well-known member
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Are religious grounds enough to keep him from performing marriages. I though that that was part of the job. Kudos to him for his stand.
 

rocketman

Resident Rocket Surgeon
Hall of Fame
Pandora's box is now wide open...does perceived rights of homos to marry, trump religious freedom of those that refuse to be a party to it??? this issue has just begun...
 
Last edited:

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Can't wait for the day when you folks are fighting for the right of a Muslim judge to not marry a Christian couple. :up:

what Christian couple would want to be married by a mooslim?


maybe it's time for you to put the bong away and take a nap
 

rougueone

New member
Can't wait for the day when you folks are fighting for the right of a Muslim judge to not marry a Christian couple. :up:

It will get much worse. Christians will be the the target. Many here are siding with the law. Yet Scripture invalidates the law when Jesus is being followed. Romans 13 is null and void when Jesus is the purpose.

Most will duck and hide. All the while declaring Jesus as Lord.
 

Jose Fly

New member
Pandora's box is now wide open...does perceived rights of homes to marry, trump religious freedom of those that refuse to be a party to it??? this issue has just begun...

First, they're not "perceived" rights. They have the right to marry as decided by the US Supreme Court.

Also, if our government grants the right to discriminate based on religious beliefs to Christians, it has to allow the same for people of all beliefs and non-beliefs.
 

Jose Fly

New member
It will get much worse. Christians will be the the target.

The target of what? People going into public businesses and expecting to be treated like everyone else? Or going into government buildings and expecting the government to not discriminate against them?

Many here are siding with the law. Yet Scripture invalidates the law when Jesus is being followed. Romans 13 is null and void when Jesus is the purpose.

Most will duck and hide. All the while declaring Jesus as Lord.

The US is not a theocracy.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Many here are siding with the law. Yet Scripture invalidates the law when Jesus is being followed. Romans 13 is null and void when Jesus is the purpose.

Most will duck and hide. All the while declaring Jesus as Lord.


Fun to watch, ain't it? :banana:
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
First, they're not "perceived" rights. They have the right to marry as decided by the US Supreme Court.

Also, if our government grants the right to discriminate based on religious beliefs to Christians, it has to allow the same for people of all beliefs and non-beliefs.

Where US law is not based on God's Law, it has no validity at all
 
Top