Oh the Irony...

[JudgeRightly]

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...ng-fight-live-vacant-california-home-n1115546

Alternate title: "Squatter Bums Successfully Evicted from Property they do not Own"

 

[ok doser]

remember Trevon Johnson and his idiot cousin?

"How else he gonna get his money?"

 

[God's Truth]

remember Trevon Johnson and his idiot cousin?

"How else he gonna get his money?"

He only needs one outfit now.

 

[quip]

Party time!:the_wave:

A development company evicts homeless poor moms.

What a world-wide victory for parsimonious conservatives! :BRAVO:

 

[God's Truth]

Party time!:the_wave:

A development company evicts homeless poor moms.

What a world-wide victory for parsimonious conservatives! :BRAVO:

There are homeless shelters everywhere, so why do they have to steal someone else's space?

 

[quip]

There are homeless shelters everywhere, so why do they have to steal someone else's space?

If you had read the article it clearly stated a protest against local gentrification.

 

[God's Truth]

If you had read the article it clearly stated a protest against local gentrification.

The article is about homeless women being evicted from vacant home.

You are the one who did not read the article.

 

[ok doser]

There are homeless shelters everywhere, so why do they have to steal someone else's space?

it's called trespassing - try doing it on my land and I'll shoot you

 

[God's Truth]

it's called trespassing - try doing it on my land and I'll shoot you

Right; can you imagine people just living in your home. I won't rent out a home because I know how people treat stuff that ain't theirs.

 

[quip]

The article is about homeless women being evicted from vacant home.

You are the one who did not read the article.

The women, who are members of the Moms 4 Housing activist collective, moved into the house in November after not being able to find an affordable place to live in Oakland.

On Monday, Moms 4 Housing held a rally outside the home, drawing hundreds who came out to support the women in protesting the gentrification of Oakland, and make clear they consider housing to be a human right.​​​​​​

You daft? :idunno:

 

[quip]

There are homeless shelters everywhere, so why do they have to steal someone else's space?

“There are four times as many empty homes in Oakland as there are homeless people,” Karim said at a press conference outside the home in November. “Why should anyone, especially children, sleep on the street while perfectly good homes sit empty?”

 

[JudgeRightly]

The women, who are members of the Moms 4 Housing activist collective, moved into the house in November after not being able to find an affordable place to live in Oakland.

On Monday, Moms 4 Housing held a rally outside the home, drawing hundreds who came out to support the women in protesting the gentrification of Oakland, and make clear they consider housing to be a human right.​​​​​​

You daft? :idunno:

Two homeless mothers in Oakland, California who were occupying a vacant residence owned by a development company were evicted

In other words, they didn't own the house they were living in, nor had any right to be in it.

Daft indeed...

They're a couple of husband-less bums who think they can get away with trespassing and theft.

What they each need is a good husband who can provide for them, OR to find a better paying job (or another job) and start working to provide for themselves so that they can afford a place to live.

 

[JudgeRightly]

“There are four times as many empty homes in Oakland as there are homeless people,” Karim said at a press conference outside the home in November. “Why should anyone, especially children, sleep on the street while perfectly good homes sit empty?”

Because those bums who live out on the street don't have the right to be in those buildings.

Now, if they were to buy or rent or lease them, that would be one thing. But instead they choose to be bums and remain on the street because people like you defend their trespassing on property they don't own.

 

[JudgeRightly]

and make clear they consider housing to be a human right.​​​​​​

By the way, housing is not a human right. To purchase and own property is a right. The houses were purchased and owned by the renovation company. And as such, bums like these women do not have the right to trespass, let alone live, in those homes.

If they want to be able to afford a home, they need to work for it.

 

[JudgeRightly]

The article is about homeless women being evicted from vacant home.

You are the one who did not read the article.

He can't understand why a company wouldn't want two women living in a home they (not the women) own the rights to.

 

[quip]

Two homeless mothers in Oakland, California who were occupying a vacant residence owned by a development company were evicted

In other words, they didn't own the house they were living in, nor had any right to be in it.

Daft indeed...

They're a couple of husband-less bums who think they can get away with trespassing and theft.

What they each need is a good husband who can provide for them, OR to find a better paying job (or another job) and start working to provide for themselves so that they can afford a place to live.

Duly noted.

Seems you missed the gentrification aspect of the article because you were simply too busy passing judgment upon them....meaning, you see what you want to see and superficially gloss over the gist.

Typical and convenient conservative blind-spotting.

 

[quip]

He can't understand why a company wouldn't want two women living in a home they own the rights to.

Yes, because the pecuniary motive for gentrification escapes me! :cigar:

Boy, you're insightful.

 

[ok doser]

The women, who are members of the Moms 4 Housing activist collective, moved into the house in November after not being able to find an affordable place to live in Oakland.

ya know, I probably wouldn't be able to find an affordable place to live in Manhattan, either. Or London or Paris or Berlin.


If I moved to Manhattan or London or Paris or Berlin, I could claim to be "homeless" as well, which would, apparently, allow me to break the law

 

[quip]

ya know, I probably wouldn't be able to find an affordable place to live in Manhattan, either. Or London or Paris or Berlin.


If I moved to Manhattan or London or Paris or Berlin, I could claim to be "homeless" as well, which would, apparently, allow me to break the law

It would?

 

[JudgeRightly]

Duly noted.

Seems you missed the gentrification aspect of the article because you were simply too busy passing judgment upon them....meaning, you see what you want to see and superficially gloss over the gist.

Typical and convenient conservative blind-spotting.

Seems you missed the point of this thread, which was pointing out the irony of women who bemoan the fact that some people own homes while others do not being kicked out of homes that they themselves did not own.

Gentrification has nothing to do with this thread.