Now We Know What McCabe Was Leaking and Why

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
Now we know what McCabe was leaking and why.

Andrew McCabe lied four times to the Department of Justice and the FBI - including two times while under oath with Inspector General Michael Horowitz, according to Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) appearing on Fox News.

This is the first time the public has heard more detail of the circumstances behind the decision to fire McCabe just over one day before he qualified for his full pension.

JORDAN: “McCabe didn’t lie just once, he lied four times. He lied to James Comey. He lied to the Office of Professional Responsibility and he lied twice under oath to the Inspector General. Remember, this is Andrew McCabe, Deputy Director of the FBI. This is Andrew McCabe, the text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page talking about Andy’s office, the meeting where they talk about the insurance policy in case Donald Trump is actually President of the United States… Four times he lied about leaking information to the Wall Street Journal.”
Specifically, McCabe authorized an F.B.I. spokesman and attorney to tell Devlin Barrett of the Wall St. Journal, just days before the 2016 election, that the FBI had not put the brakes on a separate investigation into the Clinton Foundation - at a time in which McCabe was coming under fire for his wife taking a $467,500 campaign contribution from Clinton proxy pal, Terry McAuliffe.

The WSJ article in question reads:

New details show that senior law-enforcement officials repeatedly voiced skepticism of the strength of the evidence in a bureau investigation of the Clinton Foundation, sought to condense what was at times a sprawling cross-country effort, and, according to some people familiar with the matter, told agents to limit their pursuit of the case. The probe of the foundation began more than a year ago to determine whether financial crimes or influence peddling occurred related to the charity.

Some investigators grew frustrated, viewing FBI leadership as uninterested in probing the charity, these people said. Others involved disagreed sharply, defending FBI bosses and saying Mr. McCabe in particular was caught between an increasingly acrimonious fight for control between the Justice Department and FBI agents pursuing the Clinton Foundation case.​

So McCabe leaked information to the WSJ in order to combat rumors that Clinton had indirectly bribed him to back off the Clinton Foundation investigation, and then lied about it four times to the DOJ and FBI, including twice under oath.

Meanwhile - let's not forget, the FBI had evidence from undercover informant William D. Campbell, who recently told Congressional investigators that he collected smoking gun evidence of Russia routing millions of dollars towards a Clinton charity in advance of Clinton's State Department approving the Uranium One deal. Which McCabe was supposed to be investigating... and which the Little Rock field office took over in January of this year.

For the rest of the story:


There is no way out for McCabe unless he makes a deal and squeals on Obama!
 

jgarden

BANNED
Banned
Once again our Beloved President and his Attorney General have taken decisive action by purging the government of traitor elements, like Assistant Director McCabe, who have chosen to swear loyalty to the Constitution instead of our Dear Leader!

By withholding the report upon which the decision was made only relieves the American public of the heavy burden of being exposed to any evidence that might contradict the decision made by our "trusted" leaders!
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
Once again our Beloved President and his Attorney General have taken decisive action by purging the government of traitor elements, like Assistant Director McCabe, who have chosen to swear loyalty to the Constitution instead of our Dear Leader!

So when McCabe lied under oath he was swearing loyalty to the Constitution?
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
If McCabe lied under oath it really doesn't matter whether Trump admitted firing him to stop the investigation or not. McCabe would join the list of administration officials found to be criminals. Rightly so, if he's guilty. Whether or not any of that amounts to obstruction of justice is Meuller's concern.
 
Top