Kind of a "heavy handed generalization," don't ya think?
ECT Nang's Boastful Lie
- Thread starter Doom
- Start date
Kind of a "heavy handed generalization," don't ya think?
So you believe the bible only speaks about one truth? Why not just one sentence instead of 66 books and thousands of words?
That's true!
The bible has only one message that you name as a thing called the "gospel"? You do realize gospel means good news? You are saying the bible only talks about the "gospel" (singular)as it exists conceptually in your mind?
rainee
New member
I'm sorry, RD, I never did get you put on ignore..so no miracle.
And it was Doom not you who did the poor dead creature in his avatar.
I'm sorry, truly.
I get mentally tired and got confused.
Funny, huh?
You wanted to complain I was confusing only to find I got confused when you did so.
Scary, i know...
And it was Doom not you who did the poor dead creature in his avatar.
I'm sorry, truly.
I get mentally tired and got confused.
Funny, huh?
You wanted to complain I was confusing only to find I got confused when you did so.
Scary, i know...
Jedidiah
New member
I agree with you.
I agree again.
Nope, Made Up. The most obvious division in the audience of the New Testament, is between the Circumcised and the Uncircumcised; not "reprobates" and "sons of God." No New Testament book is addressed to the lost; not a single one.
No, the fields (Matthew 9:38 "Pray ye therefore the Lord of the haruest, that hee will send foorth labourers into his haruest") divide (2 Timothy 2:15 "Studie to shewe thy selfe approued vnto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly diuiding the word of trueth") between the Circumcised and the Uncircumcised -- that's the Bible, not MAD.
I agree again.
Nope, Made Up. The most obvious division in the audience of the New Testament, is between the Circumcised and the Uncircumcised; not "reprobates" and "sons of God." No New Testament book is addressed to the lost; not a single one.
No, the fields (Matthew 9:38 "Pray ye therefore the Lord of the haruest, that hee will send foorth labourers into his haruest") divide (2 Timothy 2:15 "Studie to shewe thy selfe approued vnto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly diuiding the word of trueth") between the Circumcised and the Uncircumcised -- that's the Bible, not MAD.
Doom
New member
Yet, sometimes, there is a change of direction from the Truth as to what is to be done and by whom. This is why it is important to understand that not everything written is TO everyone universally, even though it is FOR everyone universally to read and understand.
Matt 16:20 "Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ."
Acts 17:2-3 "And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures, Opening and alleging, that Christ must needs have suffered, and risen again from the dead; and that this Jesus, whom I preach unto you, is Christ."
Nang
TOL Subscriber
The Truth of God revealed in the bible, is consistent throughout.
As God is immutable, so is His Word.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
The central message of all the Holy Scriptures, is the promise of the Savior from God.
See Luke 24:44-45
Nang
TOL Subscriber
My statement addressed the entire bible, from Genesis to Revelation.
And I believe any Godly preacher that faithfully proclaims the gospel, wields the two-edged sword of Truth, in the power of God the Holy Spirit, no matter what portion of scripture he teaches from.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
No.
Not at all. It prompted this (#1176) post from me...
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4171585&postcount=1176
Not on doctrinal truth, but if you'll read the link to my post I think you might find it significant.
I had actually come to that conclusion about you and most MADs; but suspending my conflict with you has proven the opposite with several, and should be some reflection of my heart with imputed righteousness.
And according to MAD doctrine, our conduct wouldn't be the means by which to determine another's character or salvation, so let's neither one get caught up in that, okay?
Peace.
Fair enough. Maybe so. I was simply pointing out that both MADs and non-MADs do this, so it's not a one-way thing.
Jedidiah
New member
So ?
You just completely dodged my post, while appearing to answer me, that's really dishonest and unscrupulous if it's intentional. I don't think you are dishonest nor unscrupulous.
You just completely dodged my post, while appearing to answer me, that's really dishonest and unscrupulous if it's intentional. I don't think you are dishonest nor unscrupulous.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Well, I would not say there is ever any change "from the Truth;" however, there are distinctive administrations and economics employed by God regarding His Truth.
Frankly, I think this is distinction made apart from any difference.
Doom
New member
Welcome to MAD. :cheers:
Nice to hear of your repentance and acceptance of the truth. :thumb:
Nang
TOL Subscriber
What did I not answer? You spoke of N.T. teachings, and I answered. You spoke of none of the N.T. being addressed to unbelievers, and I answered.
Anytime the Truth (gospel/Holy Scripture) is preached, it will either condemn unbelievers or save the sons of God. Same words of Truth will either judge or bless, according to the good purposes of God.
And it doesn't matter if the preacher is speaking from the O.T. or the N.T. It is all the Word of God, that concerns Jesus Christ.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Well, we can be best buddies as soon as you repent from claiming there are more than one gospel promised and proclaimed throughout history.
Doom
New member
I cannot oppose Jesus, but I guess you can, and that is a shame.
No.
Fair enough. Maybe so. I was simply pointing out that both MADs and non-MADs do this, so it's not a one-way thing.
That's fair!
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Here we go again . . . :sigh: