Mueller recalls "treasonous" meeting participant for questioning

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III has recalled for questioning at least one participant in a controversial meeting with a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer at Trump Tower in June 2016, and is looking into President Trump’s misleading claim that the discussion focused on adoption, rather than an offer to provide damaging information about Hillary Clinton.

Some defense lawyers involved in the case view Mueller’s latest push as a sign that investigators are focusing on possible obstruction of justice by Trump and several of his closest advisors for their statements about the politically sensitive meeting, rather than for collusion with the Russians.

Investigators also are exploring the involvement of the president’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, who did not attend the half-hour sit-down on June 9, 2016, but briefly spoke with two of the participants, a Russian lawyer and a Russian-born Washington lobbyist. Details of the encounter were not previously known.

It occurred at the Trump Tower elevator as the Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, and the lobbyist, Rinat Akhmetshin, were leaving the building and consisted of pleasantries, a person familiar with the episode said. But Mueller’s investigators want to know every contact the two visitors had with Trump’s family members and inner circle.

Mueller long has sought to nail down details of the unusual gathering at the height of the presidential race between three of Trump’s top campaign aides — his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and his campaign manager, Paul Manafort — and Veselnitskaya, Akhmetshin, plus a Russian language translator, a U.S.-based employee of a Russian real estate group, and a British music promoter with Russian business ties who helped bring the group together.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-probe-20180106-story.html

Apparently, Steve Bannon's new book will have important leads for Mueller;
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...ueller-to-investigate/?utm_term=.f010a7510239

Whether or not this new focus on the meeting and on Ivanka Trump's activities came from that is not clear.
 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
Maybe you haven't heard, the "meeting" was not "treasonous" - just poor word choice.

Trump Tower meeting may have been ‘unpatriotic,’ but it wasn’t ‘treasonous’


Legal analysis
In a new book by Michael Wolff, "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House," former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon calls a meeting between Trump campaign officials and a Russian lawyer during the presidential campaign "treasonous" and "unpatriotic."
The meeting at Trump Tower may or may not have been unpatriotic.
But it was not treason.

Nice try though, you're only parroting the fantasies you hear.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-tower-meeting-may-have-been-unpatriotic-it-wasn-t-n834571
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
Maybe you haven't heard, the "meeting" was not "treasonous" - just poor word choice.

Trump Tower meeting may have been ‘unpatriotic,’ but it wasn’t ‘treasonous’


Legal analysis
In a new book by Michael Wolff, "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House," former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon calls a meeting between Trump campaign officials and a Russian lawyer during the presidential campaign "treasonous" and "unpatriotic."
The meeting at Trump Tower may or may not have been unpatriotic.
But it was not treason.

Nice try though, you're only parroting the fantasies you hear.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-tower-meeting-may-have-been-unpatriotic-it-wasn-t-n834571

What has occurred to me is that Trump and Bannon may be playing the media and Democrats by this "fued" between them. Trump is very good at getting the press to go crazy about stuff like his tweets while he's actually getting things done. Liz Crokin says he is manipulating them big time by sending them in all kinds of directions because he knows how badly they hate him. This allows him distract them very easily and spend days and weeks obsessing over the most inconsequential stuff imaginable. They obsessesed over a completely fabricated dossier for a year or more, and covfefe for weeks. And it hasn't even occurred to any of them that they are being laughed at while they are playing the fool.
 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
What has occurred to me is that Trump and Bannon may be playing the media and Democrats by this "fued" between them. Trump is very good at getting the press to go crazy about stuff like his tweets while he's actually getting things done. Liz Crokin says he is manipulating them big time by sending them in all kinds of directions because he knows how badly they hate him. This allows him distract them very easily and spend days and weeks obsessing over the most inconsequential stuff imaginable. They obsessesed over a completely fabricated dossier for a year or more, and covfefe for weeks. And it hasn't even occurred to any of them that they are being laughed at while they are playing the fool.
:chuckle:
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
BREAKING: CLINTON INDICTED UNDER ESPIONAGE ACT 18 U.S. CODE 793 ONCE FBI EMAIL PROBE IS FINISHED






This is a great post. Here we have a Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders supporter, who can in no way be classified as a conservative, or even a Republican, speaking to just how deep the legal troubles are that Hillary is facing upon indictment. Even the honest left admits how corrupt and out of line she is, but yet the Marxist/socialist trolls here can't even begin to admit she has any issues at all.
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
Trump's lawyers are starting to really worry about what Bannon is going to be revealing:

An attorney for Donald Trump has sent a "cease and desist" letter to Steve Bannon. The former White House strategist is accused of making "defamatory statements" in a new book on the presidency to be published Friday... Donald Trump's lawyer Charles Harder on Thursday sent a "cease and desist" letter to former White House aide Steve Bannon, claiming that Bannon violated confidentiality agreements by talking to journalist Michael Wolff...

n remarks shared in US and British media, Bannon criticized a meeting between Donald Trump Jr., his son-in-law Jared Kushner and a Russian lawyer in 2016. Trump's son was led to believe that Moscow might have compromising information on Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. The meeting also included Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner as well as then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

"The three senior guys in the campaign thought it was a good idea to meet with a foreign government inside Trump Tower in the conference room on the 25th floor — with no lawyers. They didn't have any lawyers," Bannon reportedly said.

"Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or (not acceptable language), and I happen to think it's all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately," he is quoted as saying.

http://www.dw.com/en/donald-trump-steve-bannon-spat-presidents-lawyers-issue-legal-threat/a-42023238

It could be a innocent as Trump's lawyers thinking that maybe he's lying to them, too. He's got a history of doing that kind of thing. Or is could be that they already know what's there and in particular the money laundering that seems to have gone on in a triangle between Trump, Deutsche Bank and the Russians.

Deutsche Bank hands bank records of Trump affiliates to Robert Mueller

Bank, Trump’s biggest lender, complies with special counsel’s request
Revelation suggests Mueller is investigating finances of people close to Trump

Deutsche Bank has provided Robert Mueller with bank records of affiliates of US president Donald Trump as part of the special counsel’s investigation into whether the Kremlin conspired with the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

A person close to the bank told the Guardian that Deutsche Bank received a subpoena for documents several weeks ago but that the subpoena did not directly target Trump. Bloomberg and other media outlets said the subpoena related to people who were “affiliated” with the president.

News outlets had reported on Tuesday that the subpoena specifically targeted Trump and his family, and that Deutsche Bank – which is Trump’s biggest lender – had begun to comply with the request. Several of those news outlets changed their stories on Wednesday, and said the subpoena targeted people who had links to the president.

The revelation suggests that Mueller and his team are investigating the finances of people who are close to Trump.

The bank’s other known clients include Trump’s son-in-law and White House adviser, Jared Kushner.
Deutsche Bank examined Donald Trump's account for Russia links

Deutsche Bank declined to comment, but told Bloomberg in a statement that it always cooperated with investigating authorities.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow on Tuesday denied initial reports about the subpoena, telling Reuters: “No subpoena has been issued or received. We have confirmed this with the bank and other sources.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/05/donald-trump-bank-records-handed-over-robert-mueller
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
President Trump marshaled both his West Wing and his personal legal team Thursday against a new book that portrays him and his administration as incompetent and erratic — threatening possible libel charges against its author, its publisher and his former chief strategist, whose provocative comments pepper the book.

In an 11-page letter, Charles J. Harder, a Beverly Hills attorney representing the president, demanded that both Michael Wolff and Henry Holt and Co. — the author and publisher of the forthcoming book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House” — “immediately cease and desist from any further publication, release or dissemination of the book,” as well as apologize to Trump. The president’s lawyers also requested a complete copy of the book as part of their inquiry.

Harder sent a similar cease-and-desist letter to Stephen K. Bannon, Trump’s former chief strategist who runs the conservative website Breitbart News, alleging that he had defamed the president and violated a nondisclosure employment agreement he had signed with the Trump Organization.

The threats did not appear to work, at least as far as the book is concerned: Wolff and his publisher announced Thursday that publication had been moved forward four days to Friday because of what they described as “unprecedented demand.”

But legal experts and historians said the decision by a sitting president to threaten “imminent” legal action against a publishing house, a journalist and a former aide represented a remarkable break with recent precedent and could have a chilling effect on free-speech rights.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ba379b809ab_story.html?utm_term=.edfbe754a4ac

Which is so much posturing. Trump's lawyers are grasping at straws. Even if he succeeds in stopping publication in the US (something even a conservative Supreme Court is unlikely to permit) the book is going to be published elsewhere and will be readily available.

All Trump's frantic efforts have done is to make it a "must read" for more people.
 
Top