This question arose on another forum and I wonder how open theists would respond. How do open theists respond to Math 24.\:36, In NRSV translation, it reads: “But about that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father". A forum commentator said this:
"we learn that the future could be known by God, and was in fact known by the Father. So knowing *at least* some of the future is within the scope of omniscience."
You have to ask yourself ...... is the Son, GOD?
If your answer is "Yes", then GOD does not know everything for the simple fact that we see that the Son does not know everything.
But you also have to take the incarnation into consideration.
The Son was unique in that respect.
In order for Him to be tempted and experience the life of man, He had to, at times, only rely (for lack of a better word) on His human nature.
Hebrews 4 KJV
(15) For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.
Philippians 2 KJV
(7) But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
(8) And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
Hebrews 2 KJV
(16) For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.
(17) Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.
(18) For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted.