MADists claim to be followers of Paul.
They claim Paul was given his very own gospel (different than the one Peter taught) by the ascended Lord Jesus Christ.
No one is disputing that Paul was taught by the ascended Lord Jesus Christ, the dispute is whether or not is was a different gospel than the one Peter taught.
Paul did the following right after he began preaching his gospel to the Gentiles:
(Gal 2:2) I went in response to a revelation and, meeting privately with those esteemed as leaders, I presented to them the gospel that I preach among the Gentiles. I wanted to be sure I was not running and had not been running my race in vain.
Why did Paul go back to Jerusalem and meet in private with the leaders in Jerusalem to see if what he was preaching to the Gentiles was in vain or not?
How would these leaders (who MAD claim were in the "kingdom program"), know if the gospel Paul preached was correct or not?
MAD's claim that Paul preached a different gospel is incorrect.
They claim Paul was given his very own gospel (different than the one Peter taught) by the ascended Lord Jesus Christ.
No one is disputing that Paul was taught by the ascended Lord Jesus Christ, the dispute is whether or not is was a different gospel than the one Peter taught.
Paul did the following right after he began preaching his gospel to the Gentiles:
(Gal 2:2) I went in response to a revelation and, meeting privately with those esteemed as leaders, I presented to them the gospel that I preach among the Gentiles. I wanted to be sure I was not running and had not been running my race in vain.
Why did Paul go back to Jerusalem and meet in private with the leaders in Jerusalem to see if what he was preaching to the Gentiles was in vain or not?
How would these leaders (who MAD claim were in the "kingdom program"), know if the gospel Paul preached was correct or not?
MAD's claim that Paul preached a different gospel is incorrect.