This concerns politics.
Let's take the stance for the sake of argument that after a certain age, a human being is physiologically incapable (that is, it is physically, logically impossible) of changing their mind.
Let's further take the stance that killing human beings in order to extinguish an antisocial faith is verboten. Whatever we think about moral offenses, we agree that killing in order to extinguish the motive faith that animates such antisocial behavior (which defines the faith as antisocial; its fruit), is off the table.
Given the above, how do we deal with people who only live because we have mercifully granted them their lives, because in another time, they would be condemned and killed, by us, humanity, in the hopes of extinguishing forever the motivating faith residing in a person above a certain age who commits antisocial crimes, even regularly.
The least we can do is not kill them, given what they had to deal with.
What should we the Church do?
Let's take the stance for the sake of argument that after a certain age, a human being is physiologically incapable (that is, it is physically, logically impossible) of changing their mind.
Let's further take the stance that killing human beings in order to extinguish an antisocial faith is verboten. Whatever we think about moral offenses, we agree that killing in order to extinguish the motive faith that animates such antisocial behavior (which defines the faith as antisocial; its fruit), is off the table.
Spoiler
Let's not take these stances and judge the actions of the past, but only look at today and tomorrow; yesterday is a step along the journey, and we're trying to focus here on the present and on the future, if we can agree on this.
Spoiler
I think the first takeaway from such conditions is that we are claiming responsibility for every crime that any of us commit. We won't kill, because we claim responsibility for the crime ourselves, we committed the necessary and sufficient conditions for the crime to occur. All that was needed was a hapless immoral person to come along and trip the tripwire that we constructed, in committing the necessary and sufficient conditions for the crime to occur, needing only a criminal to play the part of evil.
We admit that we are the reason evil lives. We have created the perfect climate for the criminal. We have prepared them personally to commit crimes, and we have prepared the conditions for crime, and then we arrest and prosecute the criminals.
We admit that we are the reason evil lives. We have created the perfect climate for the criminal. We have prepared them personally to commit crimes, and we have prepared the conditions for crime, and then we arrest and prosecute the criminals.
Spoiler
I personally believe that promiscuous people are worthy of execution. They are among those who only live because we let you live, instead of give you what you deserve, which is to be killed. Because the faith that tolerates, protects or engages in the promiscuous lifestyle should be killed. The only way to extinguish a cancerous idea like that is to kill those who believe in it, and quickly and mercilessly, because that faith is destructive of us all. Your right does not extend to a right to destroy us all; our necessity is to protect ourselves from your diseased notion of life, which is tantamount to tolerating excrement all around your livingquarters, never cleaning it up, and even asking people with a straight face, "What smell?"