Has 2P2P done its homework on its "heavens"?

Interplanner

Well-known member
2P2P often makes as much out of one-off verses that it "needs" to glom on to NT teaching.

In today's drama, that expression is the 3rd heaven in 2 Cor 12:2.

Here is a short version of what the reference tool, the B-A-G lexicon, says. (This lexicon was a required purchase for Greek students at the 2P2P college I attended).

"The concept of more than one heaven is both Jewish and from among pagan sources... The plural 'ouranoi' is never found in Philo or Josephus... The plural is absent in the 4th Gospel yet is in the Rev only at 12:12 in a quote of the LXX. Ephesians always has the plural. In other NT documents, the plural and singular are interchanged for no apparent reason (Heb 9:23, 24 and an early Christian doc quoting that). It then lists several sources with "numbered" heavens going up to 8: Pseudo-Lucian, Philopatris, Simplicius, Epictetus, the Testimony of Levi and the Apocalypse of Moses... It is only in the Apocalypse of Moses (37) that "third heaven" and "Paradise" are found combined in the same way as 2 Cor 12..."

BAG, p598-9.


So STP, for one, owes us an explanation as to why he is willing to chop up heaven for the sake of the pseudo text Apocalypse of Moses, which he probably never heard of before today.

He also needs to explain if there is cell service between the sections; I need to decide which one to go to.

I'd kind of like Paradise, but I suppose there are others who would not.

And then there is this from the bio of Joan T. Mulholland of the Freedom Ride era in the US south during segregation: 'When they put us (riders) in prison, they put the black girls in one cell and us white girls in another.' That is, once you are in prison for such a thing, what difference does it make whether you are segregated? Is this the same kind of thinking?

Although I did not find the reference in BAG, neither under 'ouranois' nor in 'tritois' (third), I recall reading that the ancient world referred to the weather as the 1st heaven, the stars as the 2nd. They were thought to be concentric but functioned independent of each other. The stars did not cease to exist just because of daylight or clouds. The 8 heavens (see above) was early astronomy coming to grips with local bodies moving around us, independent of each other and of the distant stars. Likewise the 3rd heaven was the domain of God and other beings and righteous people, was again concentric and again independent of weather and stars, and did not cease simply because it was unseen. That is, it meant nothing other than heaven as opposed to earth, and was one place, undivided.
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
Here is a short version of what the reference tool, the B-A-G lexicon, says. (This lexicon was a required purchase for Greek students at the 2P2P college I attended).

vs.

He also needs to explain if there is cell service between the sections; I need to decide which one to go to.

Ending a sentence, with a preposition, are you, Geek? Please learn us sum "english grammar," sentence construction....Puh-wease, teach us, buh-wheat?
Here is a short version of what the reference tool, the B-A-G lexicon, says. (This lexicon was a required purchase for Greek students at the 2P2P college I attended).

vs.


I'd kind of like Paradise, but I suppose there are others who would not.

Such "english guh-wammer" eloquence...



Log in....lose your mind...
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
Leave it to IP to consult every book imaginable EXCEPT the Holy Bible.

:chuckle:


It was not every book except. It was a list which I have not been able to "consult". The Apocalypse of Moses is the only other location where these two things are interchanged. You sound like a Pope when you think you are informed, but you are full of it. Every aspect of everything you said here is wrong.

If Ptolemais mentioned 8 heavens, you better know what he means by that, right?
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
I have Psoriasis as well, though there is a medication out that is supposed to help.



You can always make yourself the fool here, but Ptolemais was the ancient Greek astronomer who already knew that the earth was in a mathematically remote place, so that when Lewis quoted that to an astronomer in a British university in 1940, and that British astronomer realized that the Bible already knew that the heavens were vast, it disrupted the fellows disdain for the Bible and moved him toward faith. See the essay "Religion and Science" in GOD IN THE DOCK.

But you are always welcome to shoot yourself in the face.
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
You can always make yourself the fool here, but Ptolemais was the ancient Greek astronomer who already knew that the earth was in a mathematically remote place, so that when Lewis quoted that to an astronomer in a British university in 1940, and that British astronomer realized that the Bible already knew that the heavens were vast, it disrupted the fellows disdain for the Bible and moved him toward faith. See the essay "Religion and Science" in GOD IN THE DOCK.

But you are always welcome to shoot yourself in the face.

I'd rather talk about the Bible, and it's description of the heavens.
Have you studied Job?
 

Danoh

New member
You can always make yourself the fool here, but Ptolemais was the ancient Greek astronomer who already knew that the earth was in a mathematically remote place, so that when Lewis quoted that to an astronomer in a British university in 1940, and that British astronomer realized that the Bible already knew that the heavens were vast, it disrupted the fellows disdain for the Bible and moved him toward faith. See the essay "Religion and Science" in GOD IN THE DOCK.

But you are always welcome to shoot yourself in the face.

Well, he was close - psoriasis - FROM THE GREEK - psora: itch, and psorian: have an itch :chuckle:
 

Danoh

New member
I'd rather talk about the Bible, and it's description of the heavens.
Have you studied Job?

Nah; when it comes to actually studying the Bible itself, a word like Job, just doesn't fit well with him.

Spoudazo; Interplanner - Spoudazo - 2 Tim. 2:15 :chuckle:
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
Nah; when it comes to actually studying the Bible itself, a word like Job, just doesn't fit well with him.

Spoudazo; Interplanner - Spoudazo - 2 Tim. 2:15 :chuckle:

We don't need to study Job, he is hardly (if at all) reiterated in the "NT".
 
Top