Gay man starts social media campaign over church dismissal for unrepentant homosexual

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
Gay man starts social media campaign over church dismissal for unrepentant homosexuality

DALLAS (Christian Examiner) – A gay man disciplined by a Dallas church for giving in to his homosexual desires is now the center of a social media campaign against the congregation.

On Oct. 9, Jason Thomas, who was removed from the membership of Watermark Community Church a year ago, posted the letter informing him of the elders' decision to remove him from the church on social media.

The letter said the church had undertaken a difficult but necessary step to encourage Thomas to recognize the "destructive pattern [of behavior] that prohibits us in caring for you and playing the role you desire for us to have in your life (1 Peter 5:1-4; Acts 20:28)."

"Specifically, your desire to actively participate in a same-sex relationship with another man, and your unwillingness to heed biblical counsel from your church to turn from that relationship, has made it exceedingly difficult to shepherd you during this time," the letter said.

The letter said Thomas had heeded the church's counsel in the past and repented of the sin of homosexuality, but "this is no longer the case."

"So, in obedience to Matthew 18:15-18 and 1 Corinthians 5:11, we are left with no other option but to remove you from our body and treat you as we would anyone living out of fellowship with God ... and we lovingly, but firmly, call you back to repentance. This means that you are no longer a member of our body at Watermark."

The letter concludes with steps Thomas could take to return to the church, including exhibiting repentance and going through biblical counseling.

"We affirm your many gifts, your heart of kindness, and we value the way God has uniquely formed you (Psalm 139:13-14). We all pray for your repentance and full restoration so that your gifts and passion can be fully unleashed for the Kingdom of God. We love you, Jason, and stand at the gate for you and eagerly await God's restoration in your life (Luke 15:20)," the letter concluded.

A return to the church, while not impossible, seems much less likely now that Thomas is receiving both affirmation and support for his views that the church is wrong. Thomas also posted a letter to the church on his social media page claiming he was celebrating "a very interesting anniversary with you."

"It was exactly one year ago when you told me that I was no longer worthy to serve, be in a community group, and be a member of your church," Thomas wrote on his Facebook page.

Thomas said he spent years battling against homosexuality and believed God would change him. He said he prayed daily for change, but "when I wasn't able to change, you turned your back on me."

"You say our 'sin' is not unique, but you treat us in a unique manner; this is unacceptable behavior. We are actual people that have actual feelings," Thomas wrote.

In the posting, he accuses the church of tarnishing the name of God among Christians and non-Christians alike and suggests that the church – which has followed the biblical model of discipline – should be ashamed of itself. Jesus, Thomas wrote, was angry with people who told others they were not worthy to be His followers.

"Thank you for removing yourself from my life! I am who God made me to be. I cannot change my sexual orientation and nor would I want to. I now have internal peace and happiness like never before," Thomas concluded.

Thomas has since received a significant amount of support from those who claim the church isn't following biblical standards. On the church's Facebook page, some of the responses are also favorable to Thomas. More, however, are encouraging to the church and its leaders.

The church issued a statement after the flurry of news reports now surrounding Thomas's departure from the church. It said that it wanted to offer clarification for those outside of the church as to what transpired.

The congregation, the statement said, "loves and welcomes people of all backgrounds, economic statuses, ethnicities, sexual orientations, and struggles. Also following His example, we encourage people to turn away from sin and to follow Jesus."

"As directed by Scripture, Watermark makes a distinction between regularly attending and being a formal member of our church. We don't remove someone's formal status as a member for struggling with sin – whether that sin is pride, materialism, or sexual sin. Every member of Watermark needs God's grace to stand firm in the midst of temptation and His forgiveness for the times we fall short."

"An individual's formal relationship with us as a member is only changed when someone no longer desires to resist sin and/or refuses our help, care, and encouragement. Even if someone's formal membership status is removed, our desire is to continue to love and care for them, and they are always welcome to attend Watermark and be reminded of the grace and truth of our Savior, Jesus Christ," the statement said.

The church also explained that before the letter presented on social media by Thomas was sent, the church went through an extensive process of attempting to counsel Thomas and instruct him in repentance. The church asked, the statement said, how it could "best love and serve him."

But, as the church noted, "In those meetings, it became increasingly clear that he no longer believed same-sex sexual activity was inappropriate for a follower of Jesus Christ, and he also made it clear that he no longer desired the help, care, and encouragement we were seeking to provide."

The church also said that until the letter was published on social media, only those closest to Thomas and the friends attempting to help him in his Christian walk were aware of the change in his membership status. He was not told he could not attend the church.

The church said it was only appropriate to change Thomas's membership status since he had moved away from the church's "core commitments, biblical convictions, and [the] values of Watermark."

On Sunday, the church's pastor, Todd Wagner, weighed in on the controversy in the Dallas Morning News. He said church discipline as a concept may seem archaic and oppressive to many, but he said the goal of it is repentance and He said "loving correction."

"Loving correction (church discipline) can be a difficult idea to understand, because candidly – though the mandate is clearly explained by Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew, most churches today completely ignore it. Discipline is an act of love, something any parent knows," Wagner wrote.

"When you enter into a formal membership covenant with a church family, the leaders and church community promise to 'keep watch over your souls,' according to Hebrews 13:17, and will be held accountable before God for your spiritual care and encouragement. This care is a sacred trust and comes with great responsibility. As members of God's family we are called to love, admonish, encourage, and help each other in our relationship with Christ."

Watermark Community Church is a non-denominational congregation that meets in three locations, including Dallas, Fort Worth and Plano.

I think they did the right thing, your thoughts?

Copy of letter:

Spoiler
14502733_10211411791320586_789690904840152797_n.jpg


While the letter was sent to him over a year ago, hes making news for being vocal about it on social media, now a year later by posting this complaint about it now:
Spoiler
Jason Thomas
October 9 at 9:43am · Carrollton ·

Dear Watermark Community Church,

Today I celebrate a very interesting anniversary with you. It was exactly one year ago when you told me that I was no longer worthy to serve, be in a community group, and be a member of your church.

I spent years in your church battling against my homosexuality. I believed with all my heart that God would change me; I prayed for change almost daily. But when I wasn't able to change, you turned your back on me.

You say our "sin" is not unique, but you treat us in a unique manner; this is unacceptable behavior. We are actual people that have actual feelings.

Here we are a year later and you are still doing to others what you did to me. You are tarnishing the name of God to Christians and non-Christians alike; you should be ashamed of yourselves! Do not forget, Jesus was a angry with people just like you who said certain groups of people were not worthy to be followers of Him.

Thank you for removing yourself from my life! I am who God made me to be. I cannot change my sexual orientation and nor would I want to. I now have internal peace and happiness unlike ever before.

Along with a copy of the letter removing him from membership


Dallas news commentary about it (of course pro gay): Watermark megachurch banned a gay man that it didn't deserve to have as a member

And a Christian Post commentary about it: Dallas Church Denounced for Dismissing Unrepentant Gay Man
Practicing Church Discipline Will Require Countercultural Courage

Of course I agree with the synopsis in the Christian post commentary.

Which do you agree with?
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
a whiny homo whining about being called out on his perversions, getting support from other whiny homos and their supporters

:barf:
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
I think they did the right thing, your thoughts?

Just so that I know your current stance on ENDA (Employment Non Discrimination Act) laws, you and I had a very heated debate over that in one of my WHMBR! threads where you took the side of the LGBTQ movement on employment and housing.

Employment Non-Discrimination Act
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is legislation proposed in the United States Congress that would prohibit discrimination in hiring and employment on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity by employers with at least 15 employees.


Has your stance changed or are you only in favor of giving religious institutions the right to deny employment to people who openly embrace this kind of perverse and immoral behavior?
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
Just so that I know your current stance on ENDA (Employment Non Discrimination Act) laws, you and I had a very heated debate over that in my WHMBR! threads where you took the side of the LGBTQ movement on employment and housing.

Employment Non-Discrimination Act
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is legislation proposed in the United States Congress that would prohibit discrimination in hiring and employment on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity by employers with at least 15 employees.


Has your stance changed or are you only in favor of giving religious institutions the right to deny employment to people who openly embrace this kind of perverse and immoral behavior?

Im not even going to attempt to defend myself against your false assertion, discuss my op, or leave my thread, thanks.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Im not even going to attempt to defend myself against your false assertion, discuss my op, or leave my thread, thanks.

I'm not here to be disruptive, I'm just asking a simple straightforward question that is documented from posts in an earlier WHMBR! thread.

If you don't want to answer what your stance on ENDA legislation is, I'll understand why.

Respectfully,

aCW
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
And back to the topic, do you think its wrong for a church to remove someone from membership for open sin?
 
Top