FDA Confirms Pfizer Vaccine 95% Effective, Warns Of 'Severe Adverse Reactions' After Dose 2

[Gary K]

That is the government telling us just how untrustworthy these vaccinations actually are. If they admit to this, imagine what the reality will be. Their own estimates of severe adverse event estimates run as high as 4.6% of those vaccinated after receiving their 2nd shot.

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Gary K]

CDC says severe adverse reaction rate to coronavirus vaccine 10x that of flu vaccines.

CDC says severe allergic reactions to the Covid vaccine run 10 times reactions to the flu shot but they're still rare

The severe allergic reactions among Covid vaccine recipients are still thought to be rare and the drugs are safe for people to use, a top CDC official said.

www.cnbc.com

 

[Gary K]

Researchers find 6 out of 10 vaccines increase overall health issues including a higher death rate from other diseases.

Six of 10 Vaccines Studied Increase Mortality - LewRockwell

The December 27, 2019, Science News DK article,1 “Vaccines — An Unresolved Story in Many Ways,” touches on one of the crucial talking points of vaccine safety and informed consent advocates, which is the intentional cover-up of real-world vaccine injuries and deaths. While the vaccine industry...

www.lewrockwell.com

 

[chair]

If you'd read the entire news report- and even consider reading the actual CDC document- you'd find out that you've swallowed a bunch of fertilizer.

 

[Gary K]

If you'd read the entire news report- and even consider reading the actual CDC document- you'd find out that you've swallowed a bunch of fertilizer.

I read all three articles plus the CDC document. The CDC document says their estimate of severe adverse effects can be as high as 4.6% of vaccine takers. It's right there in black and white. Am I somehow to dismiss their own estimates like you do? Am I to dismiss the CDC's own statements that the mRNA viruses have a 10x greater rate of serious adverse side effects than a flu vaccine? You do.

And the last article speaks to what researchers have found over the years from follow up studies on WHO vaccination programs. The author footnoted all his conclusions. Did you bother to read them? No.

You're so naive you believe there is no possibility of corruption in government and even more incredibly you believe multi-billion dollar businesses cannot be corrupt. You ought to actually research how often the pharma companies have paid fines for lying and misleading people. Those companies are so corrupt it's impossible to believe them. And how corrupt is government to agree ahead of time to indemnify them against any possible lawsuits when their products do harm people? Really? You see nothing wrong with the government not only providing the best lawyers the government has to defend the industry's failures, and then when the lawyers lose paying the victims out of taxpayers funds? You think that is highly moral behavior on the part of both the corporations and the government? The government not only works against it's own citizens by providing lawyers to defend multi-billion dollar companies against the man on the street, it makes them pay for any problems the corporations products create.

If you can't see a huge moral problem with that then your moral compass is non-operative.