lighthouse99
New member
Do you agree with this, concerning homosexuality and marriage?
“[T]here are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God’s plan for marriage and family. Marriage is holy, while homosexual acts go against the natural… Law.
Homosexual acts ‘close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.”
Governments have a solemn obligation to protect and support the true meaning of marriage… Governments which repudiate that obligation deny reality… [and] the common good which they are obliged to serve.
…[T]he Supreme Court… [recently] attempted to redefine marriage, and compelled state governments to ignore their… obligation to support… and protect the family. Because of the Obergefell vs Hodges decision, every state must now deny the sacred origins and meaning of marriage, and sanction unions of same-sex couples by calling them “marriage”
The Supreme Court compels government officials… to deny the… meaning of marriage. But [we] cannot deny reality… “In those situations where homosexual unions have been legally recognized… clear and emphatic opposition is a duty.
One must refrain from any kind of formal cooperation in the enactment or application of such gravely unjust laws and… [and] from material cooperation… Everyone can exercise the right to conscientious objection.
And each of us should do all that we can to reveal [this] truth to the world
You can probably figure out what kind of position this person has?
:think:
“[T]here are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God’s plan for marriage and family. Marriage is holy, while homosexual acts go against the natural… Law.
Homosexual acts ‘close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.”
Governments have a solemn obligation to protect and support the true meaning of marriage… Governments which repudiate that obligation deny reality… [and] the common good which they are obliged to serve.
…[T]he Supreme Court… [recently] attempted to redefine marriage, and compelled state governments to ignore their… obligation to support… and protect the family. Because of the Obergefell vs Hodges decision, every state must now deny the sacred origins and meaning of marriage, and sanction unions of same-sex couples by calling them “marriage”
The Supreme Court compels government officials… to deny the… meaning of marriage. But [we] cannot deny reality… “In those situations where homosexual unions have been legally recognized… clear and emphatic opposition is a duty.
One must refrain from any kind of formal cooperation in the enactment or application of such gravely unjust laws and… [and] from material cooperation… Everyone can exercise the right to conscientious objection.
And each of us should do all that we can to reveal [this] truth to the world
You can probably figure out what kind of position this person has?
:think: