No, not that kind. Continuously Updated Locked Threads.
A cult is nothing more than a blog represented as something its not.
On a discussion forum they are abusive.
inzlkette said:
Responsible for the thin skinned author's weaknesses?Actually the only abuse is coming from those responsible for the threads HAVING TO BE locked.
I wonder if there will eventually come a point where the number of threads about me, direct or indirect, will outnumber the rest. :think:No, not that kind. Continuously Updated Locked Threads.
A cult is nothing more than a blog represented as something its not.
On a discussion forum they are abusive.
I remember the first time you wrote that...Was Bush still in the White House?oh town
your time is coming to an end
as it should
ROFL!Responsible for the thin skinned author's weaknesses?
ROFL!
Says the one that also has locked and opened a thread of hers.
And don't forget her famous claim that she would never neg rep or report a post.As well as all of those she deleted ... and who was it again that who kept whining about the rep system? :think:
Responsible for the thin skinned author's weaknesses?
Now you have identified the difference. I only temporarily close threads. My skin is not so thin that I can't handle your caustic blathering.ROFL!
Says the one that also has locked and opened a thread of hers.
And don't forget her famous claim that she would never neg rep or report a post.
Fickle.
Now you have identified the difference. I only temporarily close threads. My skin is not so thin that I can't handle your caustic blathering.
Oh gosh, the harpie coven has gathered .... again.
No, but I suppose I'd be within rights if it mattered. Nice approach though...a novel way to attempt a one sided bit of defamation.A bit defensive today?