Lol.
And you assert being a MAD.
Continually, and by your own hand, you limit the potential depth of your perception.
Within the various sciences - biology, forensics, astronomy - even dispensationalism - there are OBJECTIVE "kinds."
Sets of "kinds" within any given "whole."
But you and I do not look at "things" from within the same perspective.
Thus, your ever consistent pigeon-holing of various of my remarks as meaning how most use words like "kinds."
There is looking at a thing.
And then there is looking at how one is looking at a thing.
The higher of the two being the latter.
How often do you pause to ask yourself "what I am about to conclude/comment on, and or against - am I certain that is just nothing more than where I am looking at it from - what have I not considered, that I might do well to consider? And what else?"
This is why you ignorantly conclude I am some sort of a Jordan drone.
The reality?
I just happen to look at things in as in depth a manner as such an individual.
Other Mid-Acts based Pastor-Teachers are also like that. He is not the exception. He is just the sharpest.
I would suggest you start looking at how you look at things; asking the above kinds of questions.
You'll begin to see much in a thing than you even now continue to unnecessarily limit yourself to looking at things from (you DO have the potential aptitude).
Do so and you'll actually begin to see more in even a simple compliment given you than your current habit of seeing it as merely a means of goading the individual who gave you the compliment.
It is past time that you up your game (perception).
That iron might sharpen...iron.