Do you think white people have the right to tell them how and when they should forget?
The KKK were made up ofProtestantsdemocrats.
The answer to racism isn't more racism.Is it justified for black people to riot, attack white people, set white people on fire, etc. because 1% of white people owned black slaves 150 years ago? Weigh in below.
Do you think white people have the right to tell them how and when they should forget?
The KKK were made up of Protestants.
There's no justification for abrogating the rights of others absent exigent circumstances that require it, like self defense. That said, it was closer to 6% in the South. Around one and a half if you included the north, where it wasn't as profitable, though the north profited by utilizing the agriculture, engaging in the transportation of slaves, etc. Or, slavery had a good bit to do with the founding of our nation and its prosperity.Is it justified for black people to riot, attack white people, set white people on fire, etc. because 1% of white people owned black slaves 150 years ago? Weigh in below.
Sure. Most of the country was Protestant and Catholics were viewed with suspicion and distaste by a large segment of them. A holdover from the 30 Years war and the religious conflict in Europe. As to the party bit, it's odd how stunted the historical knowledge of the right is on that. By way of, the South which put his poster child in play was largely a bastion of Democratic rule and strength. When the Democratic Party moved steadily into the progressive plank and range they ran to the Republican Party and have been a foundation of it since.You know what they say, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
The KKK were made up of Protestants.
I think you meant to say democrats instead of Protestants since the democrats were totally apposed to anything uplifting to the black community. Don't believe me? Here watch as a black man spells it out for you.
https://youtu.be/vb6Hv4nJ40U
There's no justification for abrogating the rights of others absent exigent circumstances that require it, like self defense. That said, it was closer to 6% in the South. Around one and a half if you included the north, where it wasn't as profitable, though the north profited by utilizing the agriculture, engaging in the transportation of slaves, etc. Or, slavery had a good bit to do with the founding of our nation and its prosperity.
The issues today evolved to some extent from the fallout of treating a race, generationally, as property. To suggest that because a few white people have been harmed by equally hate filled and ignorant people from the black community that there's some parity to what happened or that those of us in the white community can encompass the impact of that generational injury, is deeply mistaken and naive.
Sure. Most of the country was Protestant and Catholics were viewed with suspicion and distaste by a large segment of them. A holdover from the 30 Years war and the religious conflict in Europe. As to the party bit, it's odd how stunted the historical knowledge of the right is on that. By way of, the South which put his poster child in play was largely a bastion of Democratic rule and strength. When the Democratic Party moved steadily into the progressive plank and range they ran to the Republican Party and have been a foundation of it since.
I omit commenting with any real particularity on Cruc's story unless and until he can actually link to a story that sets out the particulars in support and fact.
Do you think white people have the right to tell them how and when they should forget?
There's no justification for abrogating the rights of others absent exigent circumstances that require it, like self defense. That said, it was closer to 6% in the South. Around one and a half if you included the north, where it wasn't as profitable, though the north profited by utilizing the agriculture, engaging in the transportation of slaves, etc. Or, slavery had a good bit to do with the founding of our nation and its prosperity.
The issues today evolved to some extent from the fallout of treating a race, generationally, as property. To suggest that because a few white people have been harmed by equally hate filled and ignorant people from the black community that there's some parity to what happened or that those of us in the white community can encompass the impact of that generational injury, is deeply mistaken and naive.
Sure. Most of the country was Protestant and Catholics were viewed with suspicion and distaste by a large segment of them. A holdover from the 30 Years war and the religious conflict in Europe. As to the party bit, it's odd how stunted the historical knowledge of the right is on that. By way of, the South which put his poster child in play was largely a bastion of Democratic rule and strength. When the Democratic Party moved steadily into the progressive plank and range they ran to the Republican Party and have been a foundation of it since.
I omit commenting with any real particularity on Cruc's story unless and until he can actually link to a story that sets out the particulars in support and fact.