Another reminder of how evil the Left really is
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
I don't find anything "evil" about what this woman is saying, whether she's right or wrong . I think you're quoting her out of context, Musterion to paint her as one of those "evil" liberals .
You know, those monsters who believe in equality for everyone no matter what their skin color, ethnicity, gender , religion , sexual preference etc might be , and who are opposed to oppression of minority peoples , believe that people who are down on their luck shouldn't be allowed to stave and die on the streets , college should be affordable, there should be laws regulating guns for safety , the government shouldn't allow big business to poison and destroy the environment and everyone should have clean food, air and water, who don't think Christians should be allowed to violate the rights of non-christians and gay people, gay people should have equal rights and that no one has the right to fire someone from a job merely for being gay , that women should have the right to control their bodies, lives and futures , and all that .
Those bastards ! Make America great again ! Only rich, white , heterosexual Christian males should have any rights !
You know, those monsters who believe in equality for everyone no matter what their skin color, ethnicity, gender , religion , sexual preference etc might be , and who are opposed to oppression of minority peoples , believe that people who are down on their luck shouldn't be allowed to stave and die on the streets , college should be affordable, there should be laws regulating guns for safety , the government shouldn't allow big business to poison and destroy the environment and everyone should have clean food, air and water, who don't think Christians should be allowed to violate the rights of non-christians and gay people, gay people should have equal rights and that no one has the right to fire someone from a job merely for being gay , that women should have the right to control their bodies, lives and futures , and all that .
Those bastards ! Make America great again ! Only rich, white , heterosexual Christian males should have any rights !
musterion
Well-known member
Oh? Then man up and call it. Is what she says about community authority over other people's kids right or wrong?
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
(The OP video is five years old, BTW.)
Why caring for children is not just a parent's job
Melissa Harris-Perry 04/09/13 01:14 PM—Updated 09/12/13 09:02 AM
My inbox began filling with hateful, personal attacks on Monday, apparently as a result of conservative reactions to a recent “Lean Forward” advertisement now airing on msnbc, which you can view above. What I thought was an uncontroversial comment on my desire for Americans to see children as everyone’s responsibility has created a bit of a tempest in the right’s teapot. Allow me to double down.
One thing is for sure: I have no intention of apologizing for saying that our children, all of our children, are part of more than our households, they are part of our communities and deserve to have the care, attention, resources, respect and opportunities of those communities.
When the flood of vitriolic responses to the ad began, my first reaction was relief. I had spent the entire day grading papers and was relieved that since these children were not my responsibility, I could simply mail the students’ papers to their moms and dads to grade! But of course, that is a ridiculous notion. As a teacher, I have unique responsibilities to the students in my classroom at Tulane University, and I embrace those responsibilities. It is why I love my job.
Then I started asking myself where did I learn this lesson about our collective responsibility to children. So many answers quickly became evident.
I learned it from my mother who, long after her own kids were teens, volunteered on the non profit boards of day care centers that served under-resourced children.
I learned it from my father who, despite a demanding career and a large family of his own, always coached boys’ basketball teams in our town.
I learned it from my third-grade public school teacher, who gave me creative extra work and opened up her classroom to me after school so that I wouldn’t get bored and get in trouble.
I learned it from the men who volunteered as crossing guards in my neighborhood even if they don’t have kids in the schools.
I learned it from the conservative, Republican moms at my daughter’s elementary school, who gave her a ride home every day while I was recovering from surgery.
I learned it watching the parents of Newtown and Chicago as they call for gun control legislation to protect all the children of our communities.
I learn it from my elderly neighbors who never complain about paying property taxes that support our schools, even if they have no children in the schools today.
And I have learned it from other, more surprising sources as well. I find very little common ground with former President George W. Bush, but I certainly agree that no child should be left behind. And while I disagree with the policies he implemented under that banner, I wholeheartedly support his belief that we have a collective national interest in all children doing well.
I’ll even admit that despite being an unwavering advocate for women’s reproductive rights, I have learned this lesson from some of my most sincere, ethically motivated, pro-life colleagues. Those people who truly believe that the potential life inherent in a fetus is equivalent to the actualized life of an infant have argued that the community has a distinct interest in children no matter what the mother’s and father’s interests or needs. So while we come down on different sides of the choice issue, we agree that kids are not the property of their parents. Their lives matter to all of us.
I believe wholeheartedly, and without apology, that we have a collective responsibility to the children of our communities even if we did not conceive and bear them. Of course, parents can and should raise their children with their own values. But they should be able to do so in a community that provides safe places to play, quality food to eat, terrific schools to attend, and economic opportunities to support them. No individual household can do that alone. We have to build that world together.
So those of you who were alarmed by the ad can relax. I have no designs on taking your children. Please keep your kids! But I understand the fear.
We do live in a nation where slaveholders took the infants from the arms of my foremothers and sold them for their own profit. We do live in a nation where the government snatched American Indian children from their families and “re-educated” them by forbidding them to speak their language and practice their traditions.
But that is not what I was talking about, and you know it.
I venture to say that anyone and everyone should know full well that my message in that ad was a call to see ourselves as connected to a larger whole. I don’t want your kids, but I want them to live in safe neighborhoods. I want them to learn in enriching and dynamic classrooms. I want them to be healthy and well and free from fear. I want them to grow up to agree or disagree with me or with you and to have all the freedom and tools they need to express what they believe.
And no hateful thing that you say to me or about me will ever change that I want those things for your children.
Why caring for children is not just a parent's job
Melissa Harris-Perry 04/09/13 01:14 PM—Updated 09/12/13 09:02 AM
My inbox began filling with hateful, personal attacks on Monday, apparently as a result of conservative reactions to a recent “Lean Forward” advertisement now airing on msnbc, which you can view above. What I thought was an uncontroversial comment on my desire for Americans to see children as everyone’s responsibility has created a bit of a tempest in the right’s teapot. Allow me to double down.
One thing is for sure: I have no intention of apologizing for saying that our children, all of our children, are part of more than our households, they are part of our communities and deserve to have the care, attention, resources, respect and opportunities of those communities.
When the flood of vitriolic responses to the ad began, my first reaction was relief. I had spent the entire day grading papers and was relieved that since these children were not my responsibility, I could simply mail the students’ papers to their moms and dads to grade! But of course, that is a ridiculous notion. As a teacher, I have unique responsibilities to the students in my classroom at Tulane University, and I embrace those responsibilities. It is why I love my job.
Then I started asking myself where did I learn this lesson about our collective responsibility to children. So many answers quickly became evident.
I learned it from my mother who, long after her own kids were teens, volunteered on the non profit boards of day care centers that served under-resourced children.
I learned it from my father who, despite a demanding career and a large family of his own, always coached boys’ basketball teams in our town.
I learned it from my third-grade public school teacher, who gave me creative extra work and opened up her classroom to me after school so that I wouldn’t get bored and get in trouble.
I learned it from the men who volunteered as crossing guards in my neighborhood even if they don’t have kids in the schools.
I learned it from the conservative, Republican moms at my daughter’s elementary school, who gave her a ride home every day while I was recovering from surgery.
I learned it watching the parents of Newtown and Chicago as they call for gun control legislation to protect all the children of our communities.
I learn it from my elderly neighbors who never complain about paying property taxes that support our schools, even if they have no children in the schools today.
And I have learned it from other, more surprising sources as well. I find very little common ground with former President George W. Bush, but I certainly agree that no child should be left behind. And while I disagree with the policies he implemented under that banner, I wholeheartedly support his belief that we have a collective national interest in all children doing well.
I’ll even admit that despite being an unwavering advocate for women’s reproductive rights, I have learned this lesson from some of my most sincere, ethically motivated, pro-life colleagues. Those people who truly believe that the potential life inherent in a fetus is equivalent to the actualized life of an infant have argued that the community has a distinct interest in children no matter what the mother’s and father’s interests or needs. So while we come down on different sides of the choice issue, we agree that kids are not the property of their parents. Their lives matter to all of us.
I believe wholeheartedly, and without apology, that we have a collective responsibility to the children of our communities even if we did not conceive and bear them. Of course, parents can and should raise their children with their own values. But they should be able to do so in a community that provides safe places to play, quality food to eat, terrific schools to attend, and economic opportunities to support them. No individual household can do that alone. We have to build that world together.
So those of you who were alarmed by the ad can relax. I have no designs on taking your children. Please keep your kids! But I understand the fear.
We do live in a nation where slaveholders took the infants from the arms of my foremothers and sold them for their own profit. We do live in a nation where the government snatched American Indian children from their families and “re-educated” them by forbidding them to speak their language and practice their traditions.
But that is not what I was talking about, and you know it.
I venture to say that anyone and everyone should know full well that my message in that ad was a call to see ourselves as connected to a larger whole. I don’t want your kids, but I want them to live in safe neighborhoods. I want them to learn in enriching and dynamic classrooms. I want them to be healthy and well and free from fear. I want them to grow up to agree or disagree with me or with you and to have all the freedom and tools they need to express what they believe.
And no hateful thing that you say to me or about me will ever change that I want those things for your children.
It's nothing new. I remember a neighbor lady catching me playing with matches. She harangued me and told my dad...I was grounded for a week. I don't know which was worse!
That old nosey biddy!:chuckle:
glorydaz
Well-known member
Nowadays, your dad would be getting a visit from Children's Services, and he'd have to jump through hoops....grounding you would be considered abuse.
Your neighbor did good...you little rascal.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Always over-reacting, aren't they? :chuckle:
No kidding.
Let me be the first to inform them that I am not at all responsible for other people's kids being obnoxious brats.
Other things he almost feels: questionable looking melons at the supermarket and that tingle that would have told him his shampoo is working.
So he can't quite feel, and he's hearing things.
lain:Awwww... Did that mean Annabenedetti and her facts spoil your fun again? Poor baby
Well, the left’s kids do wind up in the prison collective..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Should people be allowed to beat, starve, and/or sexually abuse their children, or withhold lifesaving medical care from them? No, I don't think so.
Kids are not the property of their parents. They are people in their own right, and deserve the protection of the law.
