Not a great team in the bunch.
You do know that Peyton Manning's only Super Bowl win came against the Rex Grossman led Bears, who arguably were one of the worst Super Bowl participants of all-time?
Not a great team in the bunch.
What competition did Jordan and the Bulls have in the East when they won their championships? The Knicks? Pacers?
I would have to check sports-reference.com, but Elway had the worst Superbowl performance in 1989.
Both Finals teams this year would get run off the floor in 4 straight by the teams I watched when I started watching the NBA.
Do you realize I'm using my Colts as an argument AGAINST using regular season wins as an indicator of greatness? lain:You do know that Peyton Manning's only Super Bowl win came against the Rex Grossman led Bears, who arguably were one of the worst Super Bowl participants of all-time?
Do you realize I'm using my Colts as an argument AGAINST using regular season wins as an indicator of greatness? lain:
Do you realize I'm using my Colts as an argument AGAINST using regular season wins as an indicator of greatness? lain:
It is on the point I'm making.It's not apples to apples.
That's not really true. But the most dominant season of the Pats ended with a loss in the game that mattered most. So?Every time the Colts dominated the regular season, they choked in the post-season.
Against a broken team it still couldn't sweep.The Warriors dominated the regular season, then won the championship.
Sure there are. The Colts won the pants off the regular season. And the year they won their ring they went 12-4.There's absolutely no similarities between the Colts and Warriors.
That's because you're irrational where the Colts are concerned.Had the Warriors choked, and lost in the first round, then I could see the comparison
That's because you're irrational where the Colts are concerned.
Can't wait until the season starts. I'll be interested in how my Colts and my former qb do.84 days until my Steelers play the Patriots.
87 days till Peyton Manning plays the Ravens.
:argue:
Against a broken team it still couldn't sweep.
Warriors win, thread closed.
It isn't about the sweep, tet. It's about failing to sweep a team missing two high caliber starters when you field that glorious record and the league MVP.When that great Celtics team won 8 straight championships from 1959 - 1966 they had ONE sweep. They also had three series that went 7 games.
I'm pretty sure I noted that the teams playing in that run were better and I'd take any number of them to best GS in a finals.When the Bulls won six championships in the 90's they had ZERO sweeps.
Right. And none of those played injury decimated teams with so-so benches to reach to while advancing against a stronger competition.When the Lakers won five championships in the 80's they had ZERO sweeps. When the Celtics won three championships in the 80's they had ZERO sweeps.
Tet, you know that's not the picture.Yet, for some reason, you claim the Warriors championship this year is diminished because they didn't sweep the Cavs.
Elway's Super Bowl XXII rating was 36.8 (third worst).
I still can't believe the Warriros are NBA champions! :banana:
It's been such a long wait. I started watching the Warriors during the Bernard King days (about 1981).I didn't know it then but the team was in decline. King was an All-Star in 1981-82. So of course the Warriors traded King to the Knicks where King became a New York sports hero.