Interplanner
Well-known member
Darwin was pushed into publishing in 1859, through emotional sabotage etc from T. Huxley. In 1869, Harvard University needed a new president. The new president appointed a Dr. Langdell to the Law department. The qualifying factor? Theological adherence to ORIGINS OF SPECIES, including the elimination of God from the picture of the universe and, of course, from law.
They forced this through education, popularizing any material that would conflict with the Bible. Pioneers traveling the Oregon Trail, for ex., received pamphlets from back east about watching for other dinosaur bones than the ones already found, because it was a foregone conclusion that this meant the Bible was cuckoo. Even the language Landell chose to describe his work, and new paradigm, used some of the same language as the biological descriptions of Darwin, as though man were merely that.
So what is the political aspect of this? That once God is removed from the place it has in the Declaration of Independence and from the Constitution, the State is the basis for rights, dignity, values. There is nothing above man except concensus on those things. That was the political goal of these elites back then, and going forward. They want countries dictatable by...themselves. If you disagree with the State they lock you up. This is not theoretical. Germany went this direction. German monism, the view that it as a people was true nature and the one true human reality, dates back to Darwin's counterpart in Germany, Ernst Haeckl and his material on recapitulation.
In recent years, I find that the elites have actually backed off from their base, because there is the practical reality of 'do not steal' which, unfortunately for them, is in the Bible which they detest, and which undergirds most of the other commands (the other violations are essentially a form of theft). So the elites have turned to the accusation of racism to villify Christianity and the Bible, even though the basis for eliminating it is in the DI and in Jefferson's own comments.
It is no wonder then that the current supreme court members in favor of same-sex marriage is not concerned the least to have violated all the principles of recusal in passing same-sex marriage. They are dictators, because they are born of a dictatorial ideology. The passage was sort of billboard for the overthrow of the (perhaps) last ongoing objective biological corroboration of Genesis, that God made male and female. What a primitive idea--two genders. It is an appendage now that the State (read: the most radical elites) is in charge of all definitions.
Why was the Judeo-Christian base not likewise a dictatorship, you may ask? Because it was above men. It affirmed a personal-infinite Creator. Not a man or council determining these, although there is enough common sense in them that they are found through most cultures (Lewis "Illustrations of the Tao" in THE ABOLITION OF MAN). That is exactly why the French and Russian revolutions failed. There was neither transcendant authority--nor common sense.
They forced this through education, popularizing any material that would conflict with the Bible. Pioneers traveling the Oregon Trail, for ex., received pamphlets from back east about watching for other dinosaur bones than the ones already found, because it was a foregone conclusion that this meant the Bible was cuckoo. Even the language Landell chose to describe his work, and new paradigm, used some of the same language as the biological descriptions of Darwin, as though man were merely that.
So what is the political aspect of this? That once God is removed from the place it has in the Declaration of Independence and from the Constitution, the State is the basis for rights, dignity, values. There is nothing above man except concensus on those things. That was the political goal of these elites back then, and going forward. They want countries dictatable by...themselves. If you disagree with the State they lock you up. This is not theoretical. Germany went this direction. German monism, the view that it as a people was true nature and the one true human reality, dates back to Darwin's counterpart in Germany, Ernst Haeckl and his material on recapitulation.
In recent years, I find that the elites have actually backed off from their base, because there is the practical reality of 'do not steal' which, unfortunately for them, is in the Bible which they detest, and which undergirds most of the other commands (the other violations are essentially a form of theft). So the elites have turned to the accusation of racism to villify Christianity and the Bible, even though the basis for eliminating it is in the DI and in Jefferson's own comments.
It is no wonder then that the current supreme court members in favor of same-sex marriage is not concerned the least to have violated all the principles of recusal in passing same-sex marriage. They are dictators, because they are born of a dictatorial ideology. The passage was sort of billboard for the overthrow of the (perhaps) last ongoing objective biological corroboration of Genesis, that God made male and female. What a primitive idea--two genders. It is an appendage now that the State (read: the most radical elites) is in charge of all definitions.
Why was the Judeo-Christian base not likewise a dictatorship, you may ask? Because it was above men. It affirmed a personal-infinite Creator. Not a man or council determining these, although there is enough common sense in them that they are found through most cultures (Lewis "Illustrations of the Tao" in THE ABOLITION OF MAN). That is exactly why the French and Russian revolutions failed. There was neither transcendant authority--nor common sense.
