Search results

GM is just a tool... according to my perception of the Woodshed's response to his trolling, that is.

Dear friends, We have a good morning thread here and it just occurred to me (because of my leaning towards going to bed right now at this early hour) that we ought to also have a thread to tell one another good night. May these following verses be upon each who wish others their night time...

It seems to me, from what I have read, that this 'preconceived notion' is not peculiar to Christians alone, but is also held by some within Judaism. The Sadducees (sad-you-see) did/do not hold to bodily resurrection. The Pharisees (fair-you-see) do, and some even hold to reincarnation as well...

LOL

Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father. John 6:46 Also, don't you believe that Jesus is God? Many have seen Him after His resurrection. Do you deny it?

He appears to me to be someone who has seen God.

Did you miss taking your vitamins today?

You've just admitted what you are denying, if you could but see it. That's because you don't see it. Observe what is highlighted in yellow. He stated that he has "ALSO READ" the UB, right after speaking of reading the bible. That means yes, he has read the bible too.

The one in post #2664 Reads like this: Done to give the impression that Freelight said "No" to the question of if he had read the bible. Glad you asked so that someone just now coming into the thread will know.

Your quotation of Freelight is a total and intentional misrepresentation. That's called false witnessing in case you didn't know.

And what is this? Oh the oxymoronism!

The first thing I thought when I read this was: the new age of believers are those who believe MAD. (I'll have to work out the details.) MADists are Paulians for they follow Paul and not Christ. How much more anti-Christ can you get? LOL, and just how long ago did this MAD Paulianism doctrine...

You are welcome. :) Peace be with you.

Bahaullah said what he said sometime after the year 1880. Add a thousand years, and we'd get 2880. The thousand years hadn't passed, yet.

And, you are saying this because? If it is because of the new revelation idea, then consider the similarities between the book of Daniel and the book of Revelation. (I consider the books to reveal the spiritual progression of an individual.)

Christ is not a concept or metaphor. I have met Jesus, and He is not an allegory. Yet, at the same time, I can recognize the value of myths, which are not untrue stories in my estimation. I am in agreement with Joseph Campbell. You? Except for a fact, among other facts, that the heavens were...

Yes, it's quite the tome. I too was more interested in what you were focused on. I did read the other stuff... No, I haven't. Yep. Our spin. :) And even so, the previous revealed truth remains... as a foundation. It is not dismissed or eradicated. Oh yeah... by the time I got around to...

Thank you. I can agree that revelation of truth, that which has always been there, but not evident, can increase as humanity progresses into their HU-man-ity. Do you know about Baha-u-llah? (I almost feel silly asking you that question... ) It was a sentence in one of his writings that allowed...

Thank you. Yes, might of been this thread or another. I could find out if I put forth the effort. Okay then, I did read it. It's not that I didn't read it, or recall it. My point wasn't about that so much as the "age", if we can call it that, of truth. So much is being called "new age"...

And yet the charge of ignorance. Was it available 15 years ago? I read what was available then. Of course it was, but it was much more difficult to obtain and maintain, since not having the spiritual assistance from a higher plane that Christ now supplies. In re-reading my response I see I...