Search results

the preist freely offering judas 30 pieces of silver judas freely choosing to betray Jesus for 30 pieces of silver judas freely choosing to give the silver back priests used the money to buy the potter's field but open theism ? God maybe has some foreknowledge ... but he can't have exhaustive...

open theism holds onto the literal when they shouldn't

I know and you know but the word of faith people hold onto this verse like a fat kid loves candy John 10:34-35 [34] Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? [35] If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came (and the scripture cannot be broken), when...

it does follow highly detailed foreknowledge of the crucifixion and what everybody else would do proves God can know Daniel & Revelation says he knows the beginning the middle and the end .Isaiah 46:10 open theism arbitrarily says God is incapable of exhaustive foreknowledge , what is God's...

word of faith theology “You are gods” Psalm 82:6 / John 10:34 John 10:34-35 [34] Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? [35] If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came (and the scripture cannot be broken),

confession through projection ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

reminded me of the Truman show , only in reverse , paranoid ,who is in on it . was he free to choose ?

✌️🤟 #20 The relevant question is: At the moment when God already infallibly believed that they would not repent, could they instead repent while that actual belief remained a fact of the past? If yes, God’s belief could be false. If no, repentance was not genuinely possible in the actual...

reminds me of the word of faith theology “You are gods” Psalm 82:6 / John 10:34 if God infallibly knows their choice of "they did not repent" who is responsible for "they did not repent" God or the unrepentant open theist don't believe in foreknowledge , so open theist deny a mechanism ,they...

not prediction its more than that , has to be foreknowledge such as spear in the side , no broken bones , cast lots for clothing , hands and feet pierced , vinegar to drink , crucified between criminals , flogging and revelation and Daniel are what must take place Rev 4:1 currently watching

this to open theism is fact , God did not know Genesis 18:21) I will go down now and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which has come to Me. And if not, I will know this to open theism is God knew but didn't know (Genesis 13:13) But the men of Sodom were wicked...

15 this would be presupposition :The vision itself portrays what might happen in actual history if the relevant circumstances do not change. 16 this would be presupposition : the vision was not intended as an infallible recording of unalterable future history ( i added "not" as that is the open...

"Open theists always want to say that God's foreknowledge does conflict with human freedom" if he had it , with the "Rev 9:20-21 they did not repent" which is clearly foreknowledge the open theist applies their presupposition of God has no foreknowledge and viola no proof text for you therefore...

says the guy putting in less effort , hypocrisy well now I understand open theism eisegesis takes a few favorite verses Genesis 22:12 “Now I know ” open theism uses "now I know" , can only be interpreted as God doesn't know the future which = not settled Then via eisegesis apply that to...

well now I understand open theism eisegesis takes a few favorite verses Genesis 22:12 “Now I know ” open theism uses "now I know" , can only be interpreted as God doesn't know the future which = not settled Then via eisegesis apply that to Revelation chapters 4-22 to wave them away while...

true (Matthew 10:29) “Two sparrows are sold for a penny, aren't they? Yet not one of them will fall to the ground without your Father's permission. God is keeping track of an estimated 50 Billion birds today but couldn't keep track of the only two people on the earth

and Jeremiah 18 “if that nation repents, I will relent” open theism uses “if that nation repents, I will relent” as prophecy is not settled once you say "they did not repent" may or may not be true you're off the reservation you are saying the whole book of Revelation may or may not be true

you are the one that says it takes a thousand years to eat a piece of fruit to avoid the truth of spiritual death at the fall of man ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (II Timothy 3:7) Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth what did I get wrong? well now I understand open theism...

well now I understand open theism eisegesis takes a few favorite verses Genesis 22:12 “Now I know ”Gen 3:9 "where are you" and Jeremiah 18 “if that nation repents, I will relent” and makes them the controlling presupposition for the entire Bible. as an open theist you must accept God doesn't...

God already determined the course its a rhetorical question. so that's open theism denying scripture with the special pleading of " it's prophecy" God doesn't know what is talking about the same God who in the old testament established himself by prophecy and called for the death penalty for...