Search results

Is that what the text says?

I use NKJV as I don't speak early modern English. And change the mistakes as needed.

Fixed it. I bumped it for the invites from youtube and X.

Let's see the archive of videos of the media grilling Biden on releasing the Epstein files, since Trump is the main player according to them.

5 Then the word of the Lord came to me, saying: 6 “O house of Israel, can I not do with you as this potter?” says the Lord. “Look, as the clay is in the potter’s hand, so are you in My hand, O house of Israel! 7 The instant I speak concerning a nation and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, to...

You refuse to see what God says of himself? Here is another mentioned in essay form a few posts above. 35 And they built the high places of Baal which are in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire to Molech, which I did not command...

The answer is in the text. Moses wrote as that is what the Holy Spirit had him write. To see what Adam would call them. You really are an idolater, just like the others here. You have your own version of God in your head. All I am doing is going with what the Bible says. Why is that so hard?

Like all other renovations? Does it matter what RINOs want?

Like ttruscott, you didn't answer such a simple question. I asked what was answered in the text, so you can see what God says of himself in the Bible.

You didn't put the answer in bold. You put bold on your red herring. God brought the animals to see what Adam would call them. I notice the lack of answering such a simple cut and dried question. That shows me dishonesty in the heart.

Negative ghost rider, the pattern is full.

:ROFLMAO:

Saying you don't know why God brought the animals to Adam, when that is easily checked, comes across as being dishonest. I also realized you have no idea what the Bible says. That is just an observation, and common not knowing what the Bible says.

(y)

This site is a good place to learn. If somebody doesn't post scripture, it is assumed or made up. If it is made up, others will point it out in a hurry. And opening a tab to something like Biblegateway.com is a good idea while you are here, or any where when discussion is consequential.

Now you do. It comes off as intellectually dishonest, like you posted in something other than full candor. God brought the animals to Adam to see what Adam would call them. This means it was his choice. Answer my question and it will answer your question.

Somehow liberal women stealing wine bottles after it was over is a thing on X. I have to be honest, I find it funny. Like Steve Inman videos.

I don't like this order. People in government do it to hide their dishonest actions. He might not know any better.

This question is also in the OT forum. I asked Bright Raven a question. According to God's testimony of himself in the Bible, on the first page, why did he bring the animals to Adam? I say, why would anyone want to know what somebody with pronouns and purple hair is doing with their "partner".