Search results

At the beginning of the fifth century, John Chrysostom, the Patriarch of Constantinople, was in Ephesus replacing seven corrupt bishops. Jerome, who was getting a lot of attention, was finishing his Vulgate, a Latin translation of the bible and it would include the Apocalypse. Augustine didn't...

She can't. Calling Islam the fourth beast of Daniel doesn't look good. People like me have to do it. Sebeos was the first to do it. Tom Holland is the latest In The Shadow of the Sword

To shew unto his servants. All named John. All three of them. Three different Johns. Three different Apocalypses. Only the last one remains. John was told to eat the book and prophesy again. And again.

Your said re-offer.

Where is that written?

Please give me one example.

And you wonder why we don't fraternize with you? Just to set the record straight, I care about what the bible says and I'm still Catholic.

For the time is at hand. The time was near for the first coming and the job for John the Baptist was to prepare the way. For the Lamb. He didn't know it was Jesus.

I wish. Sometimes all you can do is leave.

I disagree with you.

That is what I did in one of my more popular threads.

A better understanding of what it is all about and an assurance that the good guys win in the end. You don't have to understand it but it might help if you did. According to Daniel, it will all be revealed as the end nears. With the internet the whole world can learn something overnight.

Numbers are relevant in that it indicates how reasonable the beliefs are.

They are leading in New Jersey, Virginia, and New York City.

Lamb is mentioned 27 times in the Apocalypse. John the Apostle knew John the Baptist knew the Lamb of God. Who else would use the word lamb 27 times in a document?

Man is corrupt. In spite of this, it has lasted 2000 years and has a billion membership.

Where is their temple? Do they have a billion membership?

My thread. I am in charge of the argument.

Not so fast. It is still standing after 2000 years. Show me anything that has lasted that long.

Here we have Irenaeus in the second century talking about ancient copies of the Apocalypse. We also have Victorinus and Eusebius not aware of the seven churches of the Apocalypse in the 3rd and 4th centuries. How would you explain that?