Search results

Poppy cock! There is no such teaching in scripture. The verse you cite is general advice and it's good advice but it cannot be rightly used to construe such a law. There are as many different reasons for a wife to withdraw sexually as there are women who have done it. Some of those reasons are...

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. I certainly hope that I am because it seems to me that he believes that God has created a situation where rape cannot occur within a marriage and that if anything similar to rape happens it's the fault of whichever spouse was the one saying "No!" because...

Prediction confirmed. There was never any chance whatsoever that any straight answer was forthcoming from B57 to a perfectly clear and simply question that any Calvinists couldn't possibly resist the need to complicate. The fact is that it doesn't depend on what I mean by call! Your own...

What you see or don't see is not relevant. The FACT is that there is nothing there that "expressly forbids" anything! Thank you for conceding the debate. Forbidding a spouse to withdraw consent would be a de-facto permission to rape, by definition. No it IS NOT!!! Good grief man! Listen to...

False premise. I Corinthians does not expressly forbid any such thing. The bible does not teach a defacto permission to rape one's wife! It is NOT the fault of the wife if the husband forces himself on her! This is perhaps the most foolishly evil position I've ever seen you take.

Beware of double talk! Calvinists love to give lip service to man's will but they don't really believe it exists. Watch this..... Here's a simply question that b57 almost certainly with not answer. At least, he won't answer directly, or, if he does, it'll be weeks from now or in another thread...

Incredibly, that is precisely what Calvinists in general and b57 in particular believes! "I admit that in this miserable condition wherein men are now bound, all of Adam's children have fallen by God's will... ...Nor ought it to seem absurd when I say, that God not only foresaw the fall of the...

No, I wrote it myself, last week. Well, it was last week for me. I have a time machine where I can go back do cool stuff like that.

I cor. 7 does not canonize new law. It's advice. Denying one's spouse without cause is foolish and will have undesirable consequences but it is not expressly forbidden. If someone is denying their spouse long term and without cause, it would be grounds for divorce, not rape.

Yes.

Any who would seriously entertain the question, "Does a husband have the right to rape his wife?" is at a level of stupity rivaled only by the moron who asked the question! By idiots who wouldn't know what justice looked like if it walked up and gave then the slap across the face that they...

I ask again... Why would it be okay to MURDER someone because their father was a rapist?

Notice how this fool actually thinks that his doctrine trumps the plain reading the text of scripture! He just completely ignores what openly contradicts his doctrine and states his doctrine as refutation of God's own written word. How does this idiot think he's a Christian?

Why would that be relevant? People are not punished because they are accused of a crime but because they've been convicted of one in a court of law. If a man murders his wife, is that relevant to whether he should be executed? No! Murderers, adulterers, rapists, kidnappers, child molesters, etc...

Romans 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who [d]suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is [e]manifest [f]in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His...

I don't believe a word that you say but even if these numbers are true, which I highly doubt, it's because we do not properly punish criminals in this country.

Why would it be okay to murder someone because their father was a rapist?

I am not responsible for what you read into my comments. Silly ridiculous nonsensical stupidity. A very very small number that's not even worth mentioning, just as is the number of husbands who rape their wives. Exceptions typically prove the rule, not the other way around. If you cannot...

To say the least. Rape is about violating someone in a way that is more profound than mere physical force. It is a violation that cannot be corrected or made amends for. It tears at not only the victim but at the very fabric of society itself. The death penalty for the convicted rapist is justice.

Even that were true, which I do NOT concede, it wouldn't change the fact that rape has nothing to do with reproduction, which is why I've said repeatedly that all this nonsense you're talking about is irrelevant. The rapist isn't trying to start a family. He isn't trying to extend his liniage...