Search results

No all sins are objectively knowable, it has nothing to do with intent or volition whether or not something's a sin. Sins are objective, not subjective. Mr. Peterson never said he is a prophet, not to my knowledge.

All the time, like you.

I'm asking for something reasonable. I don't 'debate' amorphous blobs of goo, 'wax noses' that can be formed into whatever is expedient in the moment. I want to see objective proof of what MAD is and what MAD believes. It's the opposite of unreasonable. And isn't it just what you would...

OK, where is it in Luke?

It was directly opposed to your "Acts 7" reference.

It could be sooner than that. Assassination.

I'm pointing out that if a kingdom ever executes their own monarch, then that's not the same situation as before they did that.

Eh, President Trump targeted President Biden and Senator Warren way before the 2020 election. It's just electioneering, no harm in that. You know ... unless they're being criminals about it.

I never contended otherwise. But chop chop! nonetheless.

OK. But I would like to know that @Clete approves of this reference as an authoritative expression of MAD, I don't want to take anything for granted with him, tyvm.

lol what exactly do you think the three years refers to? Don't you think, maybe that's the three year earthly ministry of Jesus? And at the end of the three years, what "fruit" did the "fig tree" produce? Wasn't it the execution of their own King? Chop chop!

Exactly @john w 's point

You said and I quote " If they commit sin, they are not of God. " When you see someone commit sin, how can you tell whether they were first tempted, then enticed, then lusted for the sin; rather than simply not knowing and not consenting to commit sin, but committing sin in ignorance and or...

Even if true: he's a lightweight compared with Putin, who is an unmitigated IDIOT of EPIC PROPORTION.

Good. Where is the official expression of Marxism then, that all Marxists agree with. Should be ... no mystery at all, according to you. It's a 'moving target' is my point. No one can do anything but row in a circle when the target's moving. That's untrue. "Spoon fed" is rhetoric. I'm...

That's a bold claim that requires some substantiation. I see that there are many Russians who are demonstrating and speaking out, but you're making a big assumption that they are representative of a true majority or even super-majority of Russians. I haven't seen evidence sustaining that...

"Cleaner rat" alert!

Great! So then, let's say hypothetically, a person does not know that a sin is a sin, and engages in that sin, but unknowingly. False prophet?

Standard issue legalism. Boilerplate legalism. "Cleaner rat" alert!!! Where's @john w at when you need em ...

lol because you think His kingdom executing their own King, gets 'an out' because He came back to life! lol! I'm blushing.