Search results

Correct. He would.

No, He wasn't. His body was, the flesh-tent that He indwelt at the incarnation, that grew for 9 months in His mother's womb, and then for another 33 years until He was crucified. But Jesus Christ was not created. Jesus Christ was not created. He IS the Creator! You're literally denying...

That's.... Not how this works at all. God exists in the present. The future does not exist. The past is just a memory. God deals in the here and now, to affect the outcome that may or may not happen. If we use the chess analogy: God doesn't need to know every future move of His opponent in...

No. I'm saying that IF the future is settled (and/or infallibly foreknown exhaustively), then neither God nor man has free will.

Because He did. Because He did. Straw man. Jesus BECAME a man at the incarnation. It would help if you actually were arguing against what scripture says. They are the same Person, Doug. Jesus is both man AND God. He was not a man prior to the incarnation, but He was God. After the...

I presume you mean "linchpin"? It's not so much as "removes" as "was never there to begin with." Question: Was God ever free to choose? Read the article I posted earlier. Here's the link again: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/free-will-foreknowledge/

It's not. You're literally that dumb. And you're telling us smart people that we don't know what some big-boy words mean.

See the "supposition of infallible foreknowledge" bit. No. It's not an assumption. There is no "assumption" in what I posted above. The supposition is "infallible foreknowledge." This is what we're testing, to see what the logical conclusion of it is. The logical conclusion is, based on the...

Says the one who's in denial that the earth is a globe.

You're wrong.

99 little bugs in the code, 99 bugs in the code... fix one bug, compile it again... 129 little bugs in the code!

Saying it doesn't make it so. So it's not because it lost mass? You're delusional.

Oh, I don't know, how about passages like these, for starters...: Micah 5:2 John 1:1-3, 14-15, 18; 3:13, 16; 8:58; 17:3, 5 1 Corinthians 10:1-5 Philippians 2:5-8 Colossians 1:15-16 Hebrews 1:2-3 1 John 1:1-3 Oh, in case that wasn't enough, see also https://kgov.com/deity.

Then why are you acting like it's the worst thing ever? Indeed it was! False. Flowers was going through the CONTEXT of John 6, to show that White was reading Calvinism into the text by White ripping it OUT of its original context. If the context of a passage precludes that passage from...

You used a lot of words for what should have been a simple request. What does "vanilla Roman Catholicism simpliciter" mean? I asked for a definition, not a bunch of waffle. It applies to the entirety of scripture. Or do you think that Paul's writings are not "the oracles of God"? I wouldn't...

Using scripture to interpret scripture is a good thing! White lost that debate because he couldn't defend his position, BECAUSE He limited himself to John 6 alone. Ignoring the context of a passage in order to make a passage say what you want it to say is poor theology. What you're doing is...

Saying it doesn't make it so.

Saying it doesn't make it so.

Sorry, but you're wrong. Sorry, but you're wrong.