Search results

I concur Tomo. This is a bad parody or a real Trumpist making a fake charge who is beyond parody.

Sorry, the model used to compare to actual deaths does not include the effect of variants. This is relevant and essential to the analysis unlike gravity. You do not seek to comprehend the links that you post, it appears. Rather whether the headline supports your view is the only consideration.

Experimental results should be reproducible. We do not have to and cannot reproduce the Big Bang or abiogenesis or macroevolution. We do not have to reproduce phenomena to be secure that they exist.

Though, Trump is now onboard with the vaccine. That ship has sailed. Trump was wagging the dog. He pretended to be the leader of mildly retarded white folks, but really they lead him.

Ok doser, Do your 2021 numbers account for deaths under Trump through January 20th or allot them to Biden? Do you adjust 2020 for Trump? How can you count months before the infection was underway in the United States as ripe for comparison with Biden solidly after the infection was underway...

There has been a trend starting in 1990 and deepening in 2010 of increasing mortality. Of course with covid the trend was escalated by leaps and bounds. Covid is the main reason but there is also some other element at work here. I am beginning to wonder whether it is better for a segment of...

Do you really teach English?

Use of the term causal in this study is laughable. This analysis compares a simplistic artificial projection with actual deaths and claims firm broad conclusions. It failed to account for other variables that also directly affect cases and COVID-19 mortality (confounding factors), such as virus...

That would be your case to make. It is not obvious. Deaths during covid interventions may or may not be attributable to those interventions. Careful comparisons and the ability to look at potential confounding variables would be needed. Neither is your strong suit. In hindsight we see better...

So, you become nonresponsive when your view is criticized?

You have to take into account the viral load within the population at the start to make a valid comparison. And, you have to be deaf to irony when you avoid considering the anti-interventionist/ ant-Biden attitude that is largely responsible for the inflated numbers under Biden.

:cautious:

Millions more die by the virus in that scenario. Even expedited that would be another 2 years. Better protection against variants but not absolute protection by any means.

More people died under FDR. About as relevant. I think many more are responsible including all previous Presidents who kicked the can. But, yes the execution of withdrawal could have been better. So, the conditions in third world countries have nothing to do with it? Biden doesn't thwart...

No shame in that. Evidence so counter to your views can be daunting. It takes a better man to see when to ease back.

Liz Cheney needs to run for president in 2024, and take out Trump in the primaries. Seems impossible right now, but time could swing things. What needs to happen between now and then? The Republican party needs to purge itself from the fringe.

How? A smaller population with no resistance leads to slower proliferation and possibly herd immunity.

Fauci's estimate for efficacy was reasonably accurate for the original strain. He acknowledged that the duration of efficacy remained to be solidified. He hoped that some resistance for life was a possibility, thought at least a year was realistic, but we found 6 months was the more accurate...

I trust TomO over all his buddies on this site.

This is interesting: https://www.scripps.edu/news-and-events/press-room/2019/20191008-krishnamurthy-protocell.html