Search results

Perhaps my favorite post. I think it is accurate and wryly poetic. Did you know my post was not about murders? Or are you agreeing those legal killings should be criminalized? Stricter gun control is caused by higher murder rate. Not the other way around.

Nice quote! Evolutionary Biologists do not have to say anything about the big bang. They leave that to astrophysicists.

I think evolution going forward is in no way challenged by general principle of entropy. I comprehend that fully and have high confidence. Abiogenesis, even for a single celled life form does not sit as well for me. It would be easier if we saw protocells generate before our eyes, but the...

Have you heard of Sean Hannity?

According to you rubes can develop a complicated elegant explanatory system that yields tangible medical benefits, while geniuses hold onto beliefs that have no explanatory power or practical application. You are backwards and upside down.

It is a mystery to me that you can overlook the criminal convictions made against those in Trump's circle and against Trump businesses. One wonders how you will cope with the forthcoming criminal and civil findings directly against Trump. You exhibit true Trump derangement syndrome which...

You don't like when people at the southern border try to manipulate via the use of children, but applaud it at the northern border?

No one needs to grasp at straws when there are thousands of bushels of obvious malfeasance to choose from.

Killings by "honest" testosterone tainted gun toters increase in areas where ammosexuals reign. Making the deaths of petty criminals, intoxicated youth, and lost travelers a virtue- is in itself a tragedy.

FOX is approaching actual malice in their attempt to increase white noise about Hillary to shield Trump's legal ills. Unlike Palin's attempt to prove defamation, we could see Hillary win against FOX unless they start retracting and flying right.

Sorry, the guy making the decisions prior to the dam breaking is going to be more culpable than the one trying to contain the river thereafter.

First you rush past the motivations of Trump and the mob itself to prop up Nancy as a root cause? Next, you ignore the actual command structure of the capitol police. Nancy makes no direct calls regarding such decisions. And, her indirect role is shared with Mitch McConnell. In sum, your...

Cognitive dissonance plagues us all and we would be wise to take measures to safeguard against it.

marke makes a claim about a trend over the last four or five decades. Expose responds. Therefore, the presented data is relevant as it is in the time frame raised. But more current data is always helpful.

Okay. Then: User Name Arthur Brain Rusha Anna quip JonahDog Town Heretic The Barbarian Skeeter Some other dude < Can but won't!!

The larger point is that Trump was well-informed of the ramifications of the riot days ahead of the event and did little for hours when it got put of hand!

Are you retarded? You asked about people: "Can anyone?" and people have names.

Must seem so to you. Abstract thinking is not your forte. For you and marke, I must remember to remain concrete and use no metaphors or analogies.

Yes. Most definitely. The following people can: Neil deGrasse Tyson Richard Dawkins Daniel Dennett Greg Graffin Steven Pinker Matt Ridley Carl Sagan Peter Atkins Robert Ardrey Bill Nye, the Science Guy Walter White aka Heisenberg

Nope. You are thinking about yourself.