Young Earth or Old?

Avajs said:

I provided a reference to the USGS site.

Click to expand...

Obviously you deem the site worthless for the purpose of furnishing an answer to the question @JudgeRightly asked you. If you had an answer, you'd answer. The fact that you don't answer shows you have no answer to give, and the fact that you have no answer to give shows you did not get an answer to the question @JudgeRightly asked you from the site to which you're linking. The fact that you did not get an answer to @JudgeRightly's question from the site to which you're linking shows that (if you've even visited the site to which you're linking) you do not deem anything provided by the site to be an answer to @JudgeRightly's question.

JudgeRightly said:

So you can explain how plates of rock that are 10-60 miles thick can "subduct"?

Click to expand...

@Avajs: <NO ANSWER>

@Avajs' not answering that question is an admission that he doesn't think the site to which he has linked can explain how plates of rock 10-60 miles thick can "subduct".

JudgeRightly said:

If so, please provide, at a minimum, even a conceptual model for how it would happen?

Click to expand...

@Avajs: <NO ANSWER>

@Avajs's silence toward @JudgeRightly's request is @Avajs' admission that even he, himself, doesn't believe that the site to which he has linked furnishes anything like what @JudgeRightly has requested him to provide.

Avajs said:

The USGS site provides information.

Click to expand...

Does it provide you with an answer to the question @JudgeRightly asked you? Yes or No?

JudgeRightly said:

So you can explain how plates of rock that are 10-60 miles thick can "subduct"?

If so, please provide, at a minimum, even a conceptual model for how it would happen?

Click to expand...

So far, your failure to answer the question asked you by @JudgeRightly -- your loud silence toward it -- is the equivalent of you providing a NO in answer the question, "Does it provide you with an answer to the question @JudgeRightly asked you? Yes or No?"

In other words, whatever "information" you think "the USGS site provides", you do not think "the USGS site provides" an answer to the question you have been asked by @JudgeRightly.

Avajs said:

I'm taking a lot of science on faith if you wish to put it that way---but in every case it is faith based on evidence.

Click to expand...

Avajs said:

Have some courage to look at evidence.

Click to expand...

7djengo7 said:

On what "evidence" is your faith based that what you choose to call "evidence" is evidence?

Click to expand...

7djengo7 said:

@Avajs: <NO ANSWER>

Click to expand...

Avajs said:

I provided a reference to the USGS site. Other than that man up and investigate yourself.

The USGS site provides information. Yep, I dont know is part of science. You admit you dont know but have no desire to really find out because it may (will) interfere with your religion. Simple really.

Click to expand...

I'm 18 minutes into this video with Nick Freitas who's interviewing Tom Bilyeu, and finding it incredibly relevant to this post of yours.